New York Times Profiles Apple's App Store
In discussing the "game changing" nature of the App Store, the report quotes a "giddy" Apple senior vice president Phil Schiller, who has been Apple's primary point person for the media, particularly when it comes to the App Store.
"I absolutely think this is the future of great software development and distribution," Mr. Schiller says. "The idea that anyone, all the way from an individual to a large company, can create software that is innovative and be carried around in a customer's pocket is just exploding. It's a breakthrough, and that is the future, and every software developer sees it."
Addressing the issue of the App Store approval process, the report sees it as a "necessary evil" in order to provide a safe and secure repository of applications for customers' use. Regardless, Schiller claims that the vast majority of applications have little problem receiving approval, although there are occasional issues that crop up and the company appreciates the feedback it receives."I think, by and large, we do a very good job there," Mr. Schiller said. "Sometimes we make a judgment call both ways, that people give us feedback on, either rejecting something that perhaps on second consideration shouldn't be, or accepting something that on second consideration shouldn't be."
The article also compares the App Store's revolutionary impact on mobile applications to the iTunes Store's impact on the digital music industry, noting that while the App Store is part of the iTunes Store experience, it is a vastly different operation."A rocket ship is even too small of an analogy," says Eddy Cue, Apple's vice president for iTunes, of the App Store's popularity. "We've been able to leverage a lot of our iTunes technology for the App Store. But it's completely different. We're reviewing all of those apps. We really don't have to review each and every song."
But Apple is not alone in the industry, and the report highlights efforts on other platforms and how they differ from Apple's approach. Some companies, such as Research in Motion and Microsoft, acknowledge Apple's huge lead in the application market with over 100,000 applications and instead claim to be focused on the quality of their smaller application libraries. Others, such as Palm and Google, are offering a simpler or non-existent review process, touting unfettered access and content as their selling points.Regardless of how things turn out in the future, the report's conclusion is that Apple's iPhone and App Store will almost certainly be seen as a "turning point" in the mobile communications industry, marking the transition of mobile phones into mobile computers.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/technology/06apps.html
(If it was already posted, I apologize for sending old news.....)
The also-rans have a long way to go - not just in terms of apps, but in terms of App Store interface usability. And come the next iPhone Apple will be that much further ahead in all areas.
iTunes album = app
iTunes artist = app store publisher
iTunes studio / label = app store 'nothing'
So they could create some 'sub stores' - within the iTunes store, who could approve content directly, to spread the approval load around. Nothing stopping them having their own store too (like the iTunes exclusive albums they issue from time to time)
That way they would avoid a lot of potential monopoly / gatekeeper criticisms.
The 'sub stores' needn't be visible, they could be completely hidden to the end user. Although I can see applications where they would be brought forward for marketing purposes.
Just a suggestion
Others, such as Palm and Google, are offering a simpler or non-existent review process, touting unfettered access and content as their selling points.
Count on this changing as (if) the volume of apps on these platforms increases substantially. No one wants to be in the position of directly peddling anything and everything, even Google.
Every store has to have some control over the wares they sell, if only for legal and brand protection.
At what point will there be a way to assess the number of worthwhile applications for comparison among companies/platforms? Is it so subjective that it'll never be possible?
Q1: At no point.
Q2: Yes.
[ Read All Comments ]

Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...