Doubts Circulate of a Verizon iPhone in 2010
Despite there being a vocal outcry for Apple's iPhone to transition to the Verizon network, a couple of analyst reports this week cast doubts that we would see a Verizon iPhone in the near future. Both reports, however, seem to be based on speculation rather than any particular inside source.
Thomas Weisel analyst Doug Reid kicked off the week saying that there appears to be a growing divide with Verizon/Google/Droid on one side and AT&T/Apple/iPhone on the other. He offers T-Mobile as a possible alternative for Apple to break the iPhone's single carrier exclusivity in 2010. T-Mobile, however, has a much smaller customer base than Verizon with only half as many users. Reid expects that Verizon may opt to offer the rumored Apple Tablet or wait for an iPhone that supports 4G networks which are expected in 2011-2012.
Meanwhile, Kaufman Bros Shaw Wu echoed similar thoughts on Wednesday, noting that both Verizon and Apple have become increasingly competitive and offers T-Mobile or Sprint as possible alternatives.
Again, both reports are speculative, but are perhaps a good reminder that very few credible sources have actually confirmed that the iPhone will be offered by Verizon. The expiration of AT&T's exclusivity (believed to be) in mid-2010 makes the move possible, but the best evidence so far has been the rumor that Apple may be manufacturing a Verizon-capable phone in late 2010.
Thomas Weisel analyst Doug Reid kicked off the week saying that there appears to be a growing divide with Verizon/Google/Droid on one side and AT&T/Apple/iPhone on the other. He offers T-Mobile as a possible alternative for Apple to break the iPhone's single carrier exclusivity in 2010. T-Mobile, however, has a much smaller customer base than Verizon with only half as many users. Reid expects that Verizon may opt to offer the rumored Apple Tablet or wait for an iPhone that supports 4G networks which are expected in 2011-2012.
Meanwhile, Kaufman Bros Shaw Wu echoed similar thoughts on Wednesday, noting that both Verizon and Apple have become increasingly competitive and offers T-Mobile or Sprint as possible alternatives.
Again, both reports are speculative, but are perhaps a good reminder that very few credible sources have actually confirmed that the iPhone will be offered by Verizon. The expiration of AT&T's exclusivity (believed to be) in mid-2010 makes the move possible, but the best evidence so far has been the rumor that Apple may be manufacturing a Verizon-capable phone in late 2010.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)29 months ago
I love how all the analysts guess as much as macrumors members do about the iPhone.
29 months ago
I really doubt Apple is working with Verizion to sell the iPhone. They have just made Ads directed against Verizion and their lack of Talk/Surf !
29 months ago
I love how all the analysts guess as much as macrumors members do about the iPhone.
Hey, analysts like this have a great job. They look at data, read forums and make "professional" guesses!
29 months ago
On the grand scale of things I'd hate to see the iPhone supporting CDMA unless they produce a separate version just for CDMA networks. Most of the world uses GSM and I think there'd probably be a tradeoff supporting them both in a device.
Competition is a good thing, I have my UK iPhone on Orange as O2 has poor coverage outside of main urban centres, but adding hardware support just to cover one network would seem pointless. It would make sense if they plan on supporting all US CDMA networks and those in the few other countries that support it but personally I think that should be a separate model.
I believe that CDMA doesn't use SIM cards so it means that having a dual mode phone would be useless anyway as a CDMA customer couldn't roam on a GSM network without a SIM and a GSM customer couldn't roam on a CDMA network unless the handset was registered with that operator.
Competition is a good thing, I have my UK iPhone on Orange as O2 has poor coverage outside of main urban centres, but adding hardware support just to cover one network would seem pointless. It would make sense if they plan on supporting all US CDMA networks and those in the few other countries that support it but personally I think that should be a separate model.
I believe that CDMA doesn't use SIM cards so it means that having a dual mode phone would be useless anyway as a CDMA customer couldn't roam on a GSM network without a SIM and a GSM customer couldn't roam on a CDMA network unless the handset was registered with that operator.
29 months ago
Since that is what I have been posting for the better part of a year right here, perhaps this is where they did their "research"?
Rocketman
Rocketman
29 months ago
Outcry? All I see is people not understanding that Verizon will have the same exact issues as at&t because of the sheer amount of usage.
29 months ago
Outcry? All I see is people not understanding that Verizon will have the same exact issues as at&t because of the sheer amount of usage.
I'm more concerned that there is absolutely zero competition for the iPhone in the U.S. AT&T can pretty much do and charge what they please. Competition is a good thing.
29 months ago
Although I couldn't care less, because there is no Verizon in Germany :eek:, i don't think the iPhone will come to Verizon anytime soon... it seems clear to me that Verizon pushes Android and with ads directly attacking the iPhone it would be a huge suprise to see it in between...
29 months ago
Boo! Get these negative nancys out of here! I would never switch to the Deathstar (poor coverage and lots of dropped calls in my area) but if the iPhone came to VZW I would jump on it!
29 months ago
I'm more concerned that there is absolutely zero competition for the iPhone in the U.S. AT&T can pretty much do and charge what they please. Competition is a good thing.
I agree that a monopoly on a market isn't a good thing. The problem with Verizon is that they like to monopolize features in handsets. I was a subscriber to Verizon for many years. Their typical MO is to take a handset, remove the software, install their own software, and then sell back features the handset came with to their users. It was the most frustrating part of being part of Verizon. I know that Verizon has this as part of their business plan and when Apple wouldn't give them control then they turned away.
[ Read All Comments ]

Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...