Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Ordered to Pay Finalized $21.7 Million Patent Verdict, Hit With New Suit Over iPhone Camera

Silicon Alley Insider reports that Apple has been told to pay a $21.7 million patent infringement judgment to OPTi Inc., a former semiconductor company that abandoned its business to focus on pursuing patent claims against other companies.

The patent in question involves "predictive snooping" technology for transferring data and the suit was initially found in OPTi's favor by a jury back in April with Apple ordered to pay $19 million to OPTi. For unknown reasons, the judgment is only now being finalized, with Apple being ordered to pay an additional $2.7 million in pre-judgment interest.

The decision was made in the plaintiff-friendly U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Because Apple did not willfully infringe on the patent, it does not have to reimburse any attorney fees.

Obviously $21.7 million is couch change to Apple, and they have every incentive to keep fighting a patent troll. So it's possible it will appeal.

As Digital Daily notes, OPTi previously won a $10 million verdict and ongoing licensing fees from NVIDIA, and has also sued AMD over the same patent.

In other patent lawsuit news, The Loop reports that Apple has been sued by St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants over several patents it claims are being violated by Apple's iPhone camera.

Filed in the United States District Court in Delaware, the lawsuit claims that Apple's iPhone camera infringes on four separate patents including the '459, '219, '010 and '899 patents the company holds.

Apple is again not alone in being a target for St. Clair, as the group previously won significant judgments against Sony and Canon and has brought suits against a wide variety of major camera and technology companies.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

29 months ago
I hate patent trolls.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago

OPTi Inc., a former semiconductor company that abandoned its business to focus on pursuing patent claims against other companies


Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the world's newest business models....pursuing patent claims.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
I hate patent trolls, too. But unlike most people, I actually do something about them.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
Could Apple get another more lawsuits against them if they tried?!

Not just Apple almost every other company going too. Does make you wonder a little
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
Patents were introduced to protect companies who invent something and then subsequently produce the invention from having their invention copied. It was never intended to provide a source of income for trolls who never intended to even build a product. Support patent reform!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago

I hate patent trolls, too. But unlike most people, I actually do something about them.


What are you doing?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
See there, Psystar? This is why you fail. You shouldn't have tried to snarf Apple stuff after the fact, all you had to do was pretend they snarfed your stuff first. Then get a judge to believe you and... payday.

Still a parasite, either way.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago

What are you doing?


I'm a patent attorney, and I only take the defendants' side.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
Can I find them online at www.patenttrols.com?

What on earth? If they really had all these great ideas, why don't they use some of these millions to ACTUALLY BUILD THEM?

EDIT: I should register that domain then charge an absurd amount of money to the person who actually wants to use it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]