Got a tip for us? Share it...

Will Apple Meet Quarterly iPhone Sales Expectations Next Week?

Over the past several days, a number of analysts have raised the possibility that Apple may have some trouble meeting expectations for quarterly iPhone sales, currently pegged at about 7 million, at its earnings report scheduled for next Monday.

Yesterday, Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster noted that supply constraints on the iPhone 3GS may have hindered Apple's ability to meet customer demand. Apple had noted during its July earnings conference call that supplies of the iPhone 3GS were constrained due to robust demand, and major shortages of the device were seen in several countries well into the quarter. Ever the Apple optimist, however, Munster still expects Apple to have shipped 7.5 million iPhones during the quarter, ahead of consensus estimates.

Today's story comes from Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Yair Reiner, who claims that Apple will have a difficult time meeting iPhone sales expectations after the company implied partial quarterly sales of only 3.5 million iPhones at its "It's Only Rock and Roll" media event just three weeks before the end of the quarter.

"The first hint of trouble," he writes, "surfaced during the iPod event on Sept. 9, when Apple implied that ~3.5M phones had been sold with only 21 days left in the quarter. Subsequent checks showed the iPhone 3GS sold out in many markets. Something was clearly preventing Apple from shipping to demand Consensus estimates imply that 3.5M phones flowed out to customers in the final weeks of 4Q09, which may be too aggressive."

Reiner's estimate of 3.5 million iPhones sold, however, appears to be based on Apple CEO Steve Jobs' announcement at the event that the company had sold a total of 30 million iPhones since its initial launch in 2007, subtracting from that number the approximately 26.4 million iPhones recorded in Apple's earnings reports for previous quarters. But a key unknown in that calculation is the accuracy of the "30 million" number given by Jobs.

Apple is known for promoting its sales milestones and flashing round numbers on its slides during presentations for maximum visual impact. Apple could very well have sold 31 million or more iPhones, but announced only 30 million for an easy-to-remember presentation visual. In addition, Apple may have purposely understated its sales numbers at the event as part of its usual strategy of underselling its performance to investors and analysts in order to temper expectations enough that the company can easily beat expectations at its quarterly earnings releases, generating continued enthusiasm and publicity for the company's stock.

Reiner notes, however, that even if Apple struggles to meet iPhone sales expectations due to supply issues, consumer demand remains robust. Consequently, any dip in Apple's stock price that would likely accompany an unexpectedly low number of reported iPhone sales for the quarter could be seen as a buying opportunity for investors looking ahead to greater iPhone sales for the current quarter as supplies finally catch up with demand.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

30 months ago
or was there too much competition?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
As long as it is close, it won't matter too much - as long as supply chain constraints are the reason.

The future-looking earnings are what drive stock prices so supply chain issues should be ironed out by the all important Oct-Dec quarter.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
Will Apple Meet Quarterly iPhone Sales Expectations Next Week?

Who cares?? :mad: The whole "expectations" thing is laying waste to capitalism. Why can't Apple just post a profit? All of this speculation, turns an otherwise great quarter into a so-so one.

Just keep putting out innovative products that work Apple, that's my only expectation.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago

Apple may have purposely understated its sales numbers at the event as part of its usual strategy of underselling its performance to investors and analysts in order to temper expectations enough that the company can easily beat expectations at its quarterly earnings releases, generating continued enthusiasm and publicity for the company's stock.


Wouldn't that be kind of illegal? Apple already being under the investigation of SEC to further play the investors would be potentially extremely damaging for the company.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago

or was there too much competition?


Competition from who?

The concern is Apple couldn't keep up with iPhone demand.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
Hopefully they will ramp up production. I have ordered an iPhone in Belgium but from what I read you generally have to wait for about six weeks before you get it. That's a long time...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago

Wouldn't that be kind of illegal? Apple already being under the investigation of SEC to further play the investors would be potentially extremely damaging for the company.


I don't think the iPod media event numbers are something that can prosecuted. If a company got in trouble for misrepresenting themselves at media events...there would be no more companies.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
I'm certain that the "30 million as a round number" argument is strongest here. It could have been a milestone that was passed a month before - maybe the MI hadn't been done for a while before the keynote, maybe Apple didn't want to use preliminary figures. So 30 million could have been 30 million a month earlier, so instead of it being 10 weeks into a 13 week quarter, it would have been ~6 weeks in, implying far far higher sales by the end of the quarter.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
iS THIS A RUMOR!!?!?! :confused:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
The quarter was over September 30th. Why are these issues coming up only 3 days before the earnings report? They didn't know this until the last minute?

I smell something fishy. Like certain analysts pulling strings and trying to get in at a lower price.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]