Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Corrects 10-Q SEC Filing, Announces Shareholder Approval of 'Say on Pay' Proposal

Apple today announced that it has filed an amended Form 10-Q with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, correcting errors in the reported vote totals for shareholder-submitted proposals at its most recent annual shareholder meeting.

Last week's filing incorrectly reported the voting percentages for shareholder-submitted proposals because abstentions were counted as "No" votes. Very shortly after the original filing, the company learned that these votes had been incorrectly tallied and an internal investigation confirmed the mistake was due to human error, which Apple regrets. Today's amendment correctly reports the voting results.

The correction affected the outcome of one shareholder-submitted proposal, known as "Say on Pay," which successfully passed with approximately 51.63% of votes cast under corrected counting procedures.

As a result of the corrected vote count, Shareholder Proposal No. 5 Regarding Advisory Vote on Compensation, known as "Say on Pay," was approved with a majority of votes cast. The Compensation Committee of Apple's Board of Directors has been closely following the Say on Pay issue, and anticipates that new laws or regulations will require some form of Say on Pay vote at all public companies in the near future. Even if that does not occur, Apple is committed to implementing an advisory Say on Pay vote next year.

As noted in shareholder materials for the annual meeting, the "Say on Pay" proposal will allow shareholders to cast advisory votes regarding compensation for Apple's senior management at each annual meeting. The referendums would be non-binding, but would allow shareholders a greater voice in communicating with Apple management. Apple had formally opposed the proposal as an ineffective means of offering shareholder input.

Executive compensation has become a popular topic among shareholders throughout the corporate world, with several countries recently passing laws requiring such opportunities for shareholders and the U.S. considering similar legislation.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

40 months ago
Oh no! However will Apple recruit the best and brightest executives now?!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago
glad they got the votes right. better late than never
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago
So shareholders have rights now?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago

So shareholders have rights now?



We need the ability to vote a poster to become a miserable user :D


What rights are you referring to? Shareholders can always use proxy votes etc for voting on items that are put up to vote for shareholders.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago
10-Q SEC filing has been corrected?? You don't say.. When did the corporate process minutiae become worthy of 1st page news?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago

10-Q SEC filing has been corrected?? You don't say.. When did the corporate process minutiae become worthy of 1st page news?


Say on Pay is actually a very big deal.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago

Say on Pay is actually a very big deal.


It might be a big deal for a shareholder, but it's not a big deal to the average Apple consumer who is mostly following their product line. This is really not relevant to me and probably most people. It's not worthy for Page 1.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago

Say on Pay is actually a very big deal.


Or at least its ratification by shareholders is.

I had several proxies this year with the proposal, all had management against and at least one noted that similar proposals were on lots of corporate annual agendas.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago

It might be a big deal for a shareholder, but it's not a big deal to the average Apple consumer who is mostly following their product line. This is really not relevant to me and probably most people. It's not worthy for Page 1.


i'd probably agree - but this is probably a bigger deal for Apple - which is what MacRumors covers
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
40 months ago
Not sure why this is front page news... a slight error in a 10-Q filing that has very little to no impact on Apple, its day to day operations, and most importantly, the Macrumors community
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]