Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Loses Patent Lawsuit from Opti Inc. on "Predictive Snooping"

Arstechnica reports that Apple has been ordered to pay $19 million to Opti Inc. for patent infringement on a technology called "predictive snooping":

The patent -- its full name is "Predictive snooping of cache memory for master-initiated accesses" -- describes a method to more efficiently transfer data among the CPU, memory, and "other devices." The patent was issued to Opti in June of 2002, and the company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Apple in January of 2007.

Apple, of course, has been the target of many patent infringement lawsuits. Many lawsuits, however, never come to fruition. The most recent high profile lawsuit comes from Elan who who claims Apple has infringed on their multi-touch technologies. It may be years before we hear the conclusion of that claim.

We tend to avoid reporting on all lawsuit claims, instead holding out for the ones that actually seem to stick.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

37 months ago
Nothing new. Good artists copy, great artists steal.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
ok, $19 million, not $19. i was about to say.

anyways, bad news for apple
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
stupid mistake fixed. :)

arn
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
Doesn't apple copyright just about everything they do?

And if they did copyright this and it was already copywritten by another company would it come down on the copyright office.

How do companies know if something has been done before?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
That's a lot of money, how do they determine how much you have to pay for a patent infringement?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
Has Opti, Inc. actually done anything with their patent, or have they just squated like nearly everyone else who brings a patent lawsuit?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago

Nothing new. Good artists copy, great artists steal.


I hope you aren't saying that Microsoft is good or :eek: great... I just d/l a xp powertoy that is supposed to be like expose'. Bitch please, that crap was slow as hell...:mad:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
Here's an open, honest question: Is it a good idea to leave the judgement of very technical questions (such as software patents) in the hands of 'layperson' juries? Anyone want to propose a better approach to this?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago

Doesn't apple copyright just about everything they do?

And if they did copyright this and it was already copywritten by another company would it come down on the copyright office.

How do companies know if something has been done before?


Copyright is separate from patents, but the confusion is common.
Apple does tend to get patents for every little seemingly insignificant concept, and this is precisely the reason why.
They're more interested in protecting themselves from lawsuits than actually preventing others from using the same technology.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
Nope, lay people wouldn't be the peers of a multi-national corporation..which I thought was the purpose of a jury. There should be a group, with no lobbyists or corporate sponsorship, and they decide these things. I think the average person will mostly side with the little guy in these situations.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]