Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Gets Nehalem Early, H.264 and VMWare Performance Boosts

The release of the new Mac Pro on Tuesday marked the first use of Intel's Nehalem processor in Apple's products. As in the past, Intel has allowed Apple to get early access to their newest processors ahead of the competition. These Nehalem Xeon processors used in the high end Mac Pros have not even been officially announced by Intel yet.

Apple details the technical improvements of these new Nehalem processors on their product pages for the Mac Pro. While the descriptions and benchmarks are primarily marketing materials, they do offer simple explanations of some of the new technologies found in Nehalem. Some highlights include:

- Single die 64-bit architecture with fast access to cache data
- Integrated memory controller with significantly more memory bandwidth
- Turbo Boost: "If youre using an application that doesnt need every core, Turbo Boost shuts off the idle cores while simultaneously increasing the speed of the active ones, up to 3.33GHz on a 2.93GHz Mac Pro."

While Apple's tests show large improvements in memory bandwidth and floating point performance, many customers are awaiting 3rd party benchmarks to make a final purchasing decision. Notably, however, specific tasks or applications could see significantly higher performance boosts with Nehalem than might otherwise be expected.

An x264 developer has reported that Nehalem SSE changes are extremely beneficial to x264 performance and "have led to an enormous overall performance increase[s]" over Penryn processors. As this processor support trickles out, it should speed up the time to encode H.264 video substantially.

Meanwhile, VMWare customers may also see significant improvements in running VMWare Fusion on the new Nehalem Mac Pros. According to a forum post by VMWare's Ben Gertzfield, VMWare 2.02 already supports a new feature called "Extended Page Tables" which should result in "a pretty significant performance boost on the new Nehalem CPUs when running Fusion virtual machines."

This is a huge benefit to virtualization software: without EPT, a big chunk of the heavy lifting that a virtual machine has to do is emulating the "map virtual memory address X to physical memory address Y" work that a traditional MMU does.

The first of the Nehalem Mac Pros are expected to ship early next week.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

38 months ago
Has anyone confirmed if the new Mac Pros have a Turbo button?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
Good to hear! Way to go Apple releasing the new Mac Pros!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
Good to know, encouraged at the performance boosts since clock speeds are generally lower.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago

Has anyone confirmed if the new Mac Pros have a Turbo button?


A similar image popped into my head when reading this article as well. hehe You would think they would have used something other than "Turbo". Welcome to the 80's :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
Ah, those days of my 12Mhz 386 PC with the turbo button that increased speeds to 16Mhz!! Those were the days. :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
I don't doubt 2 x 2.93Hz Nehalem will beat 2 x 3.2GHz Harpertown.

The question is will 1 x 2.66GHz Nehalem, with only 4 cores, beat 2 x 2.80GHz Harpertown with 8 cores? In multithreaded applications or multitasking that can actually use 8 cores I doubt it. Which is why Apple doesn't should that comparison in it's benchmarks. Nehalem is fast, and HT maybe worth 20% increase on average, but it's hard to see it overcoming a 2 times core count advantage. I'd love to see the third-party benchmarks one way or another.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
When will we see Nehalem XServes? One would presume fairly soon.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago

Ah, those days of my 12Mhz 386 PC with the turbo button that increased speeds to 16Mhz!! Those were the days. :p


You meant a 286 system. Intel never produced a 12 MHz 386 CPU officially--the first 80386 CPU started at 16 MHz.

And now, my home computer's Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200 runs at 2,200 MHz. :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
Sounds like a regular speed machine.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
When I hear Apple talking about "speed improvement" for me that is a an amount of crap the size of jupiter.

I see all those benchmark showing "3 time faster than the previous processor", when the reality is that is barely noticiable.

The only way for you to get those results is to buy a Mac 6 revisions later at least, or lets say, wait 3 years.

I had my quad G5 and the only time I saw a realistic speed improvement was when I got the last quad core 2.8... THEN I saw an speed improvement.

But if you think the new ones are faster than the one I just bough 3 months ago... forget about it.

It is a huge pile of marketing BS unless you have one of the first Intel machines, THEN is when NOW you will see an improvement.

The benchmarks are such waiste of time, nothings more unrealistic in this world.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]