Got a tip for us? Share it...

Core i7 (Nehalem) Based MacBook Pros Possible in Q4 2009?

Tom's Hardware reports on Intel's plans to offer their first Core i7 (Nehalem) mobile processors by the fourth quarter of 2009. These 32 nm Arrandale processors will be suitable for notebook designs, and Tom's Hardware speculates that we'll see these in Apple's notebooks:

It is highly probable that Apple will base new MacBook and MacBook Por units on 32nm Arrandale Core i7's. With 2 cores and able to process 4 threads, the new MacBook models will be able to save even more power, thanks to the smaller fabrication process as well as optimized processor features.

Apple's MacBooks and MacBook Pros, however, were last updated in October with the latest 45 nm Penryn processors. So the very next Apple notebook updates will likely come prior to the release of these processors.

The 32 nm process also represents a die-shrink over existing 45 nm-based Intel chips. The new 32 nm process is said to offer an estimated 22 percent performance boost according to Mark Bohr, an Intel senior fellow.

Intel is also expected to transition their desktop processors to the 32 nm design in the same timeframe, but Apple has yet to take advantage of Intel's "desktop"-class processors. Instead, Apple has used Intel's mobile (Mac Mini, MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac) and server (Mac Pro, Xserve) processors exclusively.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

43 months ago
Yay, this is welcome news. I knew Intel was going to be slower at delivering notebook-ready Core i7 processors than they would at desktop- and server-class ones. That said, I'm sure the entire MacBook line will get a huge performance boost when these arrive, given what the Core i7 is capable of.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Yup... Once this happens, I'll run out and buy a new MBP. Simply. Cannot. Wait.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
4 threads ... yet another excuse not to go to quad core.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Yeah Apple will most likely use Arrandale instead of Clarksfield for the notebooks due to Clarksfield's power draw. That means an update in late spring 2009 and then the Nehalem update in late 2009 or early 2010.

We'll most likely see quad-cores in the MacBook Pro when Clarksfield goes to 32 nm in 2010.

The combined new microarchitecture plus process shrink should give a pretty big performance increase.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago

4 threads ... yet another excuse not to go to quad core.


Huh?

Four threads are a lot weaker than four cores.

I'd rephrase your statement:

8 threads ... yet another excuse to go to quad core.

;)



I hope this pans out. I would also like to see a desktop processor in the iMac line as well.


How about a desktop processor in an actual desktop, not an all-in-one!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
I hope this pans out. I would also like to see a desktop processor in the iMac line as well.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Should be something to look out for but it seems so far away. I hope we aren't going to start seeing people waiting for this update for a while yet.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Yeesh. I just started looking at my MBP with contempt....

These kind of figures are quite astonishing, no? 20% increase year on year?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago

Should be something to look out for but it seems so far away. I hope we aren't going to start seeing people waiting for this update for a while yet.


Yeah, still seems weird knowing what's coming this far in advance. Kinda takes the excitement out of it...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago

How about a desktop processor in an actual desktop, not an all-in-one!

I honestly don't understand what the big deal is. Sure, a "desktop" class CPU in the iMac would be a welcome change. Apple really doesn't have any price room on the low end or the high end between the Mac mini, iMac, and Mac Pro to introduce a 4th model without cannibalizing sales of other models.

That said, I think 4 cores in a notebook would represent a significant boost in capabilities.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]