Inside iPod Video, iMac G5, and PowerMac G5
Taking this unit apart is a little bit different than previous models due to the changes in the housing design. Opening it was more akin to the nano and can be accomplished using a flat, hard tool like a screwdriver.
Meanwhile, Kodawarisan has posted images from an iMac G5 dissection. The iMac G5 was introduced during the October 12th media event alongside the Video iPod. The new iMac features a thinner case and built in iSight.
Finally, the first benchmarks comparing the new Dual Core PowerMacs (2.0 and 2.3) to the old Dual Processor 2.5GHz PowerMac. Note: benchmarks numbers from the Quad (Dual Dual-Core) PowerMac are not yet available. The benchmarks show that the Dual-Core processor (970MP) Macs have have comparable performance to the old Dual Processor (970) PowerMac even at lower gigahertz speeds. The Dual-Core 2.3GHz slightly edges out the Dual-Processor 2.5GHz PowerMac in the performance score totals.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)What's with apple and "flat hard tools"? It's like caveman-style hardware service :D
Lack of screws sure looks slick, though.
The benchmarks show that the Dual-Core processor (970MP) Macs have have comparable performance to the old Dual Processor (970) PowerMac even at lower gigahertz speeds. The Dual-Core 2.3GHz slightly edges out the Dual-Processor 2.5GHz PowerMac in the performance score totals.
Makes sense. As I have posted previously, dual-core can actually be better than dual-processor because of the benefits of cache-snooping, etc. Also, system architecture improvements such as DDR2 and PCI-e probably doesn't hurt ;)
Edit: After a close look at the benchmarks, it appears as though the dual-core systems only beat out the 2.5Ghz dual-proc system because of memory-intensive tasks. The thread/CPU intensive tasks were won by the 2.5 Ghz model. So, cache-snooping might not add quite as much as I previously thought.
I heard that DDR2 has a higher latency despite higher bandwidth.. how would this effect latency sensitive applications in comparison to older DDR Macs.
Smart move. A) it gives a good incentive for people like me to upgrade. B) it isn't going to come bite them in the arse when they move to Intel probably next revision.
What's up with the negative reviews of this story? These links are great; what could possibly make someone take the time to review them as "negative?" :confused: The Ars Technica review is as fine an example of tech journalism as I have ever seen.
Sometimes Ars does feel a little off but in general they do very good reviews!
Interesting though, wonder why Apple isnt/cant utilize the full capabilities of the Broadcom chip in the iPod?
I suspect that the new memory controller has significantly less latency in the design, so whilst it is using higher latency DDR2 memory, the overall performance is increased. Hence in memory intensive tasks the new PowerMacs perform better.
In fact, I'm sure I saw on Apples site last night a reference to 'lower latency memory controller' ... wonder if I can find it again.
[ Read All Comments ]

Hardware.info points to a presentation slide from NVIDIA showing the range of products the company's graphics chips power. The tagline reads,"From Super Phones to Super Computers". The...
Realmac Software and Impending have just released Clear to the App Store. Clear is a simplified list making application that was announced at Macworld. The App's claim to fame is the extremely...
M.I.C gadget reports that it has received information from sources indicating that Apple is "close to finally updating" its aging Mac Pro line. As we detailed in a report last month, the...
Electronista reports on a new article [Google translation] from Taiwan's Commercial Times claiming that Apple is planning for production of 65-70 million iPad 3 displays in 2012, paving the way...
CLOG, a new quarterly architecture magazine, has opted to cover Apple in its just-published February 2012 issue. The magazine offers nearly 150 pages of stories and images about Apple and...