Apple Faces Scrutiny as Sanctioned Entities Slip Through App Store Controls - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Faces Scrutiny as Sanctioned Entities Slip Through App Store Controls

Apple's App Store has been unlawfully hosting dozens of apps tied to U.S.-sanctioned companies, according to a new watchdog report (via The Washington Post).

iOS App Store General Feature Dock
The Tech Transparency Project, a non-profit advocacy group, flagged 52 apps in the App Store that had links to entities found on the Treasury Department's list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs), a designation that prohibits U.S. companies from doing business with them.

Linked organisations included Russian financial institutions such as Gazprombank and National Standard Bank propping up Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, and China's Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC), which has been sanctioned for involvement in repression of Uyghur minorities. Another app was run by a company owned by an accused Lithuanian drug trafficker.

The linked entities reportedly used name variants, shell developers, or partial references to obscure their sanctions status.

Google's Play Store was also found to be hosting 18 apps for similarly sanctioned organizations. Google took down all but one of the apps after being contacted by The Post. Apple removed 35 out of 52 during or after the investigation. Apple disputed that all the flagged apps violate sanctions, but said it was enhancing its review process.

Apple previously committed to improving sanctions detection after a 2019 Treasury settlement involving a naming-variation failure.

According to The Post, the Treasury could have fined Apple more than $70 million at the time, but said it accepted a settlement of less than $1 million because Apple had self-reported, had not had a violation in the preceding five years, and promised to revamp its sanction search tools "to fully capture spelling and capitalization variations and to account for country-specific business suffixes."

Legal experts say that prior agreement increases Apple's exposure now, since the latest similar lapses suggest its promised improvements were insufficient. The findings also call into question Apple's long-standing claim that its App Store provides a "safe and trusted" environment for users.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iOS App Store General Feature JoeBlue

Apple Adds Personalized Recommendations and New Marketing Tools to the App Store

Monday June 15, 2026 5:18 am PDT by
Apple last week announced a series of new App Store features, including personalized app recommendations and expanded tools for developers to market their apps. The most visible change for users is Personalized Collections, a new discovery feature that surfaces app and game recommendations tailored to individual interests and behavior. Alongside each recommendation, new "App Notes" explain...
iOS App Store General Feature JoeBlue

Apple 'Records Every Tap' in App Store to Filter New Personalized Recommendations Feature

Wednesday June 17, 2026 6:27 am PDT by
Last week, Apple introduced a new discovery feature for the App Store called Personalized Collections, or app recommendations based on individual interests and behavior. Apple pitched the announcement as another way for developers to have their app discovered, but there has already been some pushback from a privacy perspective. App Store user analytics collected by Apple (Image: Mysk) The new ...
iOS App Store Icons

Apple Announces Major App Store Changes on iOS in Brazil

Thursday June 18, 2026 8:50 am PDT by
Apple today announced that developers in Brazil will be allowed to distribute iPhone apps through alternative app marketplaces on iOS, and accept payments through third-party platforms. In other words, developers in Brazil will be able to circumvent the App Store and Apple's in-app purchase system, but there are still fees. Alternative app marketplaces will have to be authorized by Apple and ...

Top Rated Comments

sw1tcher Avatar
8 months ago

I live in the US as well and there is no censorship.
So the Trump administration targeting U.S. universities with funding cuts or law firms because they represent(ed) certain clients is not censorship?

What about FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatening Disney/ABC for comments made by Jimmy Kimmel:

“We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr said. “These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action, frankly, on Kimmel or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”

Carr suggested that Disney, ABC’s parent company, should address Kimmel’s conduct before the FCC gets involved. “You could certainly see a path forward for suspension over this,” Carr said.


Or the White House banning the Associate Press?

https://www.ap.org/media-center/ap-in-the-news/2025/the-associated-press-banned-from-white-house-press-pool-renews-request-to-court-for-reinstatement/


How about the Trump Admin cutting $1.1 billion in public broadcasting funds to NPR and PBS stations because he doesn't like their programming?

How about Trump suing the WSJ for $10 billion all because they wrote a story about Trump's sexually suggestive birthday card to Jeffrey Epstein?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-sues-wall-street-journal-over-epstein-report-seeks-10-billion-2025-07-19/


Next thing you're going to tell me is that Florida, Texas, and other states banning certain books ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_banning_in_the_United_States_(2021%E2%80%93present)') from school and public libraries is not censorship.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago
Pull out of the U.S. Tim!
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
sw1tcher Avatar
8 months ago

The previous administration selected only the media outlets they wanted to talk to. That was censorship and the media loved it. I guess it depends on the side of the issue you are on.
Whataboutism. Address what I posted instead of trying to deflect.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
sw1tcher Avatar
8 months ago

Google's Play Store was also found to be hosting 18 apps for similarly sanctioned organizations. Google took down all but one of the apps after being contacted by The Post. Apple removed 35 out of 52 during or after the investigation. Apple disputed that all the flagged apps violate sanctions, but said it was enhancing its review process.
So Apple will dispute that certain apps are a violation of so-and-so, but other apps

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/12/08/iceblock-dev-sues-trump-administration/

Apple will pull quickly.

Interesting.


Remember when Tim Cook said Apple "treat every developer the same. We have open and transparent rules... It's a rigorous process, because we care so deeply about privacy and security and quality. We do look at every app before it goes on. Those rules apply evenly to everyone." ?

I do.

Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago

That's nice.

I live in the US and am currently concerned about what is happening here, not here in comparison to other countries.
I live in the US as well and there is no censorship. If there was the main stream media would be pro Trump instead of liberal based.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
8 months ago

China, Russia and the UK have censorship and worse measures!
That's nice.

I live in the US and am currently concerned about what is happening here, not here in comparison to other countries.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)