Google's Pixel AI Image Creation and Editing Tools Are Kind of Terrifying

Google last week introduced the Pixel 9 smartphone lineup, with a selection of new devices that are focused on AI. All of the Pixel 9 phones support Gemini AI, and Google has also added AI-based image generation and editing tools. Reviewers have been testing the new smartphone features, and the AI image generation is probably going to turn into a PR nightmare for Google based on what's come out so far.

google pixel 9
Google introduced an AI image generation app for the Pixel phones, called Pixel Studio. It's designed to create stickers and images using text-based prompts, and it looks and sounds a lot like Apple's planned Image Playground. So far, reviewers have been able to create all manner of questionable images with Pixel Studio, ranging from a Nazi version of Spongebob to Elmo with an AK47.

pixel studio digital trends

Image via Digital Trends

Digital Trends had no trouble getting Pixel Studio to make images of beloved cartoon characters doing questionable activities. Guns, drugs, and alcohol were not off-limits, nor were offensive situations like school shootings. Pixel Studio did not generate these kinds of images unless asked, but that's most likely what people will immediately do with the feature rather than generating images of cute cats and bunnies.

Google said that there were "safety checks" in place to keep Pixel Studio from being "used nefariously," and there are some. Pixel Studio will not create images of humans, and Google is tweaking the AI in response to reviews. After speaking with Google, Digital Trends was no longer able to get Pixel Studio to create cartoon characters using cocaine or dressed as German soldiers.

Even more concerning than Pixel Studio is Google's "Reimagine" tool, which can add objects to photos that you've already taken. The Verge used it to add corpses, bombs, drugs, and disasters to images, and objects included in photos look so realistic that it's difficult to tell when an image has been edited. Google is able to do a pretty good job matching lighting and perspective to the original photo, and there are no watermarks or flags on social media. Google does add a metadata tag, but that's easy enough to eliminate with a screenshot.

You can, of course, use Reimagine for adding sunsets and rainbows to your image, just like you can use Pixel Studio for creating fun pictures, and both AI features work great, so these tools aren't all bad. Android Authority shared a post with Oreo pizza, a giraffe surfing, and kittens playing basketball, for example. As The Verge points out, you could always add a body to an image or create a picture of Elmo with a gun, but it would take some Photoshop skill and time to do so. With the Pixel phones, it takes just a thought and a few seconds to create that kind of image, and it's right there on the smartphone for anyone to use.

In statements to The Verge and Digital Trends, Google said that it designed its generative AI tools to "respect the intent of user prompts" which can lead to the creation of content "that may offend" when the user asks for it. But Google claims that there are "Terms of Service" on what content is not allowed, and that safeguards will be continually refined.

Apple hasn't yet introduced its image generation tools, ‌Image Playground‌ or Genmoji, and the media surrounding the Pixel 9 launch gives us some insight into what the response might be like if Apple doesn't get it just right. With AI, it's likely that people are going to be able to find workarounds even if Apple puts numerous safeguards in place. Apple so far has shied away from photorealistic AI images, but Google is going all in, and it's going to be much harder to trust photos on social media and the internet going forward.

Top Rated Comments

applepotato666 Avatar
16 months ago
“Oh no! The computer’s doing what I asked it to!” is something I’ll never get. As long as they don’t allow it to generate realistic images featuring real people it’s whatever because nothing’s stopping anybody from picking up Procreate and drawing these anyway.
Score: 58 Votes (Like | Disagree)
rp100 Avatar
16 months ago
A new era of freedom of speech (protected speech) has been ushered in by the advent of easily accessible AI. What is “nefarious”? Should megacorps who operate above the law be the sole judge of what is acceptable? Will the powers that be have unrestricted access to generating any image that their hearts desire? Unfortunately, 90% of the population could not care less about these questions.

Training your children to be critical thinkers will be paramount to preserving the truth.

The war of information rages on…
Score: 56 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
16 months ago
At least it didn't change SpongeBob's skin color.
Score: 44 Votes (Like | Disagree)
stiligFox Avatar
16 months ago
How many times will it take before Google and other tech giants learn that A) we don’t want this and B) no matter how much you try, people WILL find a way to use your products for nefarious purposes. They’re going to be playing whack-a-mole with their algorithm until it’s nerfed to the point it can only generate images of flowers, baby animals, and the latest product from their respective hardware branch.



How many times do we have to teach you this lesson, old man?

Attachment Image
Score: 42 Votes (Like | Disagree)
sw1tcher Avatar
16 months ago

So far, reviewers have been able to create all manner of questionable images with Pixel Studio, ranging from a WW2 German soldier version of Spongebob to Elmo with an AK47.



Image via Digital Trends
The names of the characters are shown in the AI generated images and you still got Elmo and Mr. Krabs mixed up. ?
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Analog Kid Avatar
16 months ago
I can see the potential for copyright complaints, but other than that we seem to melt down over the silliest things these days...

It's dumb, frivolous, unproductive and lazy-- but terrifying?
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)