Comparison of Cameras Across iPhone Generations

Interesting, but we really need 100% crops to get a true comparison, and some night shots too.

Here's some night shots from the original.

At the park


Having dinner


On the beach

Here's some night shots from the original.


Having dinner

Mmmm, that looks yummy. Now I'm hungry.

The original and the 3g look like garbage. The dumb phone i had at the time was far better for photography use.

Autofocus really makes a difference

That's standard apple operating procedure. They are cutting edge in some areas, but lag in others. Usually when they make up for the areas in which they are lacking they leap-frog the competition. Examples:

Bad Mobile Phone Camera --> Best Mobile Phone Camera
No MMS on iPhone --> Now you can iMessage/Tweet/MMS almost anything from any iOS device
No eSATA on Mac --> Now you get Thunderbolt
No Voice Recognition --> Now you get a personal assistant
No Copy/Paste on iOS --> Now the slickest select/copy/paste touch UI out there
No Multitasking on iOS --> Now smart Multitasking that saves your battery
No HDMI on iPhone/iPad --> Now you have HDMI/Composite/Component adapters + AirPlay
No Magazines on iOS --> Now you get Newsstand
No Third Party Apps --> Now App Store has more apps than Palm ever did
Poor Cloud Offering --> iCloud will effortlessly sync your stuff + 3rd party apps

Sure there are some things that Apple usually just does catch-up on. The "WiFi Hotspot" on iPhone was one example, but it was basically AT&T blocking that. Technically the iPhone 3GS was the first to offer tethering, but AT&T did not support it until iPhone 4 was almost out, so Apple did not bother with hotspot. And decent notifications were ultimately a cross between Web OS and Android functionality with some pretty UI and a nice sliding gesture to jump to the app and some widgets in the notification center. But Apple by and large does three things:

1) Completely change a market with a ground-breaking product introduction

2) Sit back and leap frog the competition once they feel they have something that is good enough or done right to fit with their road map

3) Produce a solid or above-average (or even best implementation) that is more or less a clone of the competition's offerings

What they don't do is:

1) Add a feature or product without extensively testing it internally

2) Add a feature or product just because the competition is doing it

3) Add something that is going to require more customer support and therefore lower customer satisfaction ratings

I don't doubt Apple's ability to add willy nilly features. Rather I suspect it comes down to internal prioritization and fitting those features into a road map that is already in place. Blu-Ray has never fit in Apple's roadmap since they want everything to be a download to a hard drive or be available in the cloud, so they will always leave that to third-party providers.

And YES, this can be frustrating when Apple's priorities don't match your personal individual priorities.

On the beach

Wow, that chick in the bikini is smokin' hot!

;)

I am pretty sure iPhone3G wasn't that bad.

I used it for almost 2 years. It took pretty good pictures. I am not a photographer but they weren't as bad as the one shown in the first pic.

Silly stupid.

They tested on a macro shot which original and 3g did not have that capability... Not fair at all...

No eSATA on Macbook Pro --> Now you get ThunderBlunder!
No USB3 on Macbook Pro --> Now you get ThunderBlunder!
No HDMI on Macbook Pro --> Now you get ThunderBlunder!

Please explain why an Intel-developed technology capable of doing ALL OF THE THINGS YOU SAID is "blunder?" Proprietary adapter? That has yet to be seen.

No ExpressCard on Macbook Pro --> Now you get SD Card Slot?!

Fair point.

That's standard apple operating procedure. They are cutting edge in some areas, but lag in others. Usually when they make up for the areas in which they are lacking they leap-frog the competition.

You are so right. In all aspects of that post actually, but I thought it'd be a long quote xD

ThunderBolt was, like USB, an Intel developed standard Apple adopted in it's early days. Look how well that worked out with USB. I'm sure some questioned it too at first.

Intel will work to bring down ThunderBolt costs over time I'm sure. Remember what it's basically giving you is DisplayPort and PCI Express (two busses of PCI Express at that on some machines!) on a portable tiny connector.

The potential is amazing. The cost, is not - yet.

Here's some night shots from the original.

At the park


Having dinner


On the beach

Post of the year!

This thread does a great job of reminding folks that not ever component Apple chooses is great. Or even good. Or even worth using at all.


No eSATA on Macbook Pro --> Now you get ThunderBlunder!
No USB3 on Macbook Pro --> Now you get ThunderBlunder!
No HDMI on Macbook Pro --> Now you get ThunderBlunder!
No ExpressCard on Macbook Pro --> Now you get SD Card Slot?!

And what's with only two ancient decade-old USB2 ports on a thousand plus computer in 2011?

Sometimes Apple gets it very right but other times Apple just plain screws up.

Yeah, how completely asinine for Apple to have the new MacBook Air, mini, and iPhone 4S be Bluetooth 4.0 ready (i.e. Bluetooth Smart) before any products ship for it. Who would want to be out in front of standardized low-power connectivity for consumer devices?

/sarcasm