Apple-Led Rockstar Consortium Sells Remaining Patent Portfolio for $900 Million - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple-Led Rockstar Consortium Sells Remaining Patent Portfolio for $900 Million

by

San Francisco patent company RPX today announced it is purchasing more than 4,000 telecommunications patents from Rockstar, an Apple-led consortium that previously acquired the patents from bankrupt Nortel Networks. The sale will net Rockstar $900 million, a fraction of the $4.5 billion the conglomerate of technology companies paid for the entire patent portfolio in 2011, although many of the high-value patents were previously dispersed to the consortium's members.

rockstar-logo
As reported by The Wall Street Journal, RPX confirmed its subsidiary RPX Clearinghouse, will license the patents to a syndicate of technology companies that include Google and Cisco Systems. RPX is making the patents available with non-exclusive licenses to all syndicate members, whose funds helped pay for the purchase. RPX also will license the patents to outside companies under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, and members of the Rockstar consortium will retain licenses for the patents.

Rockstar was formed in 2011 when Apple, BlackBerry, Ericsson, Microsoft, and Sony joined together to purchase patents from bankrupt communications company Nortel. The consortium purchased 6,000 patents, with 4,000 patents being held under the Rockstar umbrella and the remaining 2,000 patents being distributed to member companies.

The sale of the patents follows Rockstar's rather unsuccessful attempts to license the patents. The consortium also filed patent infringement lawsuits against a variety of technology companies with Google and Cisco recently settling their disputes for undisclosed amounts. As part of this patent sale to RPX, Rockstar has agreed to drop its existing suits against Samsung, LG and HTC.

Top Rated Comments

macs4nw Avatar
153 months ago
It sounds like they cherry picked the best patents out of the lot and then sold off the rest. However, they still retain access to all of the licenses included in the purchase.
Seems like a win/win.
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Eraserhead Avatar
153 months ago
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..

Or perhaps a bit of both ;).
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
153 months ago
The fact that Rockstar and its members (Apple included) keep can continue to use the patents is a good thing, since this should prevent any legal actions later. The only question I have is how they do an ROI on something like this. I mean, they spent $4.5 billion on the patents. They sell some of them and get $1 billion back, so is the ROI the reduction in lawsuits? Given all the other issues they have gone to court for, I am sure they can stick a big number on that, but $3.5 billion?

Basically just curious, since from the outside it looks like they may not invested well on this one, but I am probably missing something.

It sounds like they cherry picked the best patents out of the lot and then sold off the rest. However, they still retain access to all of the licenses included in the purchase.
Seems like a win/win.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cjmillsnun Avatar
153 months ago
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..

That was my thinking given the below...



The sale of the patents follows Rockstar's rather unsuccessful attempts to license the patents.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)
153 months ago
The fact that Rockstar and its members (Apple included) keep can continue to use the patents is a good thing, since this should prevent any legal actions later. The only question I have is how they do an ROI on something like this. I mean, they spent $4.5 billion on the patents. They sell some of them and get $1 billion back, so is the ROI the reduction in lawsuits? Given all the other issues they have gone to court for, I am sure they can stick a big number on that, but $3.5 billion?

Basically just curious, since from the outside it looks like they may not invested well on this one, but I am probably missing something.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

8 CarPlay Features in iOS 27 Feature

Which iOS 27 CarPlay Features Actually Work in Your Car?

Thursday September 17, 2026 4:17 am PDT by
In iOS 27, available now, CarPlay gets its biggest update in years, but some features depend on what type of car you have rather than your iPhone model. Some of the biggest additions won't do anything in the vast majority of vehicles on the road today. Here's how the new features pan out. Works in Any CarPlay Vehicle Custom widgets: In iOS 27, CarPlay is no longer limited to Apple's handful ...
Apple Watch New Charging Puck

Here's Why a New Apple Watch Charging Puck Was Just Released

Wednesday September 16, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
The new Apple Watch Series 12 and Apple Watch Ultra 4 have hardware changes that allow for faster charging, but you will need to use the new version of the Apple Watch Magnetic Fast Charger included in the box in order to achieve this boost. If you need extra ones for your own charging stands or travel or so forth, Apple released the new version of the charger on its online store last week, with...
iphone 18 pro max prepare

iPhone 18 Pro Max Requires 'Prepare to Ship' Battery Drain Before Shipping

Friday September 18, 2026 4:27 pm PDT by
The iPhone 18 Pro Max has a battery capacity over 20 watt-hours, which means there are additional shipping requirements. If an iPhone 18 Pro Max needs to be shipped somewhere, its maximum battery capacity has to be limited through firmware. According to Apple, the iPhone 18 Pro Max uses an "innovative battery-firmware solution" that limits battery capacity to below 20Wh between when the...