Got a tip for us? Share it...

iBooks 1.2.1 Detects Some Jailbreaks, Disables iBookstore Purchases in Response


Social Apples details a change employed in an update to Apple's iBooks application released last week that detects whether a device has been jailbroken using one of several tools, and if the device has been found to be jailbroken, refuses to open content purchased from Apple's iBookstore.

Since using the greenpois0n jailbreak, I have been unable to open some of my iBooks that I rightfully purchased from the iBook Store. I thought it was a problem with the downloaded books, so I re-downloaded them. That didnt work so I removed the iBooks from my iPhone and re-syncd them from my computer... still no luck. Then I stumbled on a tweet from @comex tonight that really blew my mind.

According to noted jailbreak author @comex, whenever a user attempts to open an eBook purchased from the iBookstore and containing digital rights management code, the new iBooks tries to run unsigned or improperly signed binaries as a test to see if the device is jailbroken. If those binaries run successfully, the device is flagged as having been jailbroken and the eBook refuses to open.

Users of devices jailbroken by one of the methods that allows Apple's test binaries to successfully run who attempt to open content purchased from the iBookstore are met with the following error message:

There is a problem with the configuration of your iPhone. Please restore with iTunes and reinstall iBooks.

Restoring a device from iTunes obviously removes the jailbreak, again rendering the device in compliance with Apple's standards.

Apple's tactics are of course drawing some scrutiny from jailbreak fans, many of whom are pointing to recent actions by the U.S. government to explicitly allow jailbreaking. Consequently, Apple's move to prevent access to legitimately purchased iBookstore content just because the user attempts to view it on a jailbroken device is seen as interference with legal usage.

Update: Reports have clarified that the jailbreaking detection mechanism has been present since iOS 4.0 and is part of the fairplayd DRM check. It has only recently been generating attention as newer jailbreak methods such as greenpois0n have opened up Apple's restrictions enough to trigger the blocks.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

17 months ago
naughty apple
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
oh noez....can't read iBooks if I'm JB'd? :rolleyes:

Yeah, imma give up my JB for this.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
It was only a matter of time.

I'm sure Apple is well aware of all the hacks.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
Awesome, so now the iBookstore that I've never used and will never use, has just made itself unavailable. (haven't checked this on my 4.1, quality jailbreak, though)

Never wanted to buy a book from Apple anyway.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
Legal usage? Since when is any company under any obligation for everything to work when you hack a device? If you choose to jailbreak, things might break.

These people have to realize that every choice can carry with it trade offs. If you want to jailbreak, go ahead but don't expect Apple to make it easy for you.

While not everyone who jailbreaks is a pirate, there is rampant piracy in the jailbreaking community so I don't expect Apple to be forced to do anything to help jailbreakers.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
The Copyright Office's determination that jailbreaking ≠ violation of the DMCA is in no way related to this issue... nothing said that Apple has to let you jailbreak without consequence, just that they can't sue you for DMCA violation for doing so.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
So, all-mighty legal people, can Apple do this without suffering lots of whining court cases? I mean, from my perspective, it's their application and store, so I find it hard to believe that, under U.S Law, it's illegal.

Surely they can reject access whenever they wish if it's mentioned in their end user license agreement (and such agreement is violated by the consumer)?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
A strong blow to the rebel alliance.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
This won't solve anything.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago

So, all-mighty legal people, can Apple do this without suffering lots of whining court cases? I mean, from my perspective, it's their application and store, so I find it hard to believe that, under U.S Law, it's illegal.

Surely they can reject access whenever they wish if it's mentioned in their end user license agreement (and such agreement is violated by the consumer)?


I think they can if it's in the license agreement. I mean you can pretty much sign your rights away in any type of contract... just ask some Marines.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]