Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Shifting to Intel Graphics for Future MacBooks and 13-Inch MacBook Pros?

Over the last few months, Apple has taken some heat for its decision to continue utilizing Intel's Core 2 Duo processors in its smaller notebook models, including the 13-inch MacBook Pro, MacBook and new MacBook Air, while the larger MacBook Pro models have incorporated more powerful Core i5 and i7 processors. Rather than it being a cost-saving move or an intentional crippling of the cheaper machines, however, the decision is related to a dispute between Intel and NVIDIA that has prevented NVIDIA from offering integrated graphics packages for Intel's Arrandale processors.

Given that design constraints inherent in the smaller notebook sizes prevented Apple from offering discrete graphics packages to pair with Intel's i-series processors, the company was left with deciding between using Intel's inferior "HD" integrated graphics with the latest i-series processors or sticking with the Core 2 Duo processors for which NVIDIA could provide its own integrated graphics solution. Apple ultimately decided that "killer graphics" would address the biggest performance bottleneck and thus opted to pair the Core 2 Duo with a custom-built GeForce 320M graphics package from NVIDIA in its smaller notebooks.

Earlier this week, it was reported that Intel and NVIDIA have settled their dispute, and while the details of the settlement have not been made public, many observers have hoped that it could allow Apple to use a package of Intel's latest processors with NVIDIA integrated graphics for better performance.

But a new report from CNET claims that Apple, impressed by Intel's forthcoming Sandy Bridge processors that will offer enhanced integrated graphics capabilities, has already decided to adopt the all-Intel solution for its smaller notebooks, squeezing out NVIDIA.

Intel's newest processor, to be formally announced January 5 at the Consumer Electronics Show, will find its way into new MacBooks that will supersede current models, according to industry sources familiar with Apple's plans. Current MacBooks use Nvidia graphics chips along with Intel Core i series and Core 2 Duo processors. But due to the enhanced graphics capabilities of Sandy Bridge, Apple--at least for now--has determined that it will not continue using Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs) in some models.

According to the report, Apple is even shifting at least partially away from NVIDIA in its larger MacBook Pros, opting to include graphics solutions from AMD in those models. It is unclear, however, whether NVIDIA options might still be available on those machines.

One question that has remained about Apple's potential adoption of Sandy Bridge is whether Intel will offer support for Apple's OpenCL specification that greatly enhances system performance in some cases by offloading tasks from the processor to the graphics hardware. While NVIDIA has supported OpenCL for some time, Intel is only just now stepping up with support for the framework on the CPU side, and CNET's sources indicate that the company is in fact also working on OpenCL for Sandy Bridge's graphics component. Should Intel be able to offer full OpenCL compatibility on Sandy Bridge, it appears that Apple stands to see significant benefits from full adoption of the platform in its notebooks.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

19 months ago
I don't care what the use as long as the video playbacks are smooth.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
thumbs down, the last time they did it the graphics werent all that...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
As long as the graphics are a step up from the current models, I'll be happy. I don't really care if its Intel, NVIDIA or AMD.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago

I don't care what the use as long as the video playbacks are smooth.


x2 on this.

I personally think Apple needs to just design its own processor and call it a day.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Just remove the optical drive from the MacBook and the 13" MBP, and poof, the space problem no longer exists. Use Intel Graphics or Fusion in the MacBook Air. Use discrete graphics in everything else.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
I have a 3 1/2 year old macbook, Core 2 Duo with a GMA950. Now that applecare has expired, I would look into getting another macbook or mac mini, but with the same Core 2 processor it's not enough of an upgrade to bother with.

Hopefully this means that the smaller macbook/mini will get enough of a performance boost to be worth it to replace this computer with a more modern one.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Can Intel really deliver better graphics than NVIDIA, hard to believe but if Apple is happy then I guess its ok.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago

Can Intel really deliver better graphics than NVIDIA, hard to believe but if Apple is happy then I guess its ok.


Yes, but only through legal means and not through having a superior product. :mad:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
That would suck.

Intel IGPs are crap, plain and simple. Not even in the same league as Nvidia IGPs. For all the geniuses at Intel, they can't seem to ship a decent IGP to save their lives.

Instead of kowtowing to Intel, Apple should use a potential shift to AMD/ATI as a threat to get Intel to play nice with Nvidia again for lower end laptops (and the mini).
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago

Yes, but only through legal means and not through having a superior product. :mad:


Intel's current HD graphics on the Arrandale chips perform a little worse than 9400M. I haven't seen any benchmarks for the new Sandy Bridge graphics yet.

Although Intel stated it will be twice the performance of the current HD graphics. Which could put it on par with the 320M. Maybe I'm just drinking some Intel Kool-Aid.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]