Got a tip for us? Share it...

U.S. Department of Justice Orders Apple and Others to Stop Engaging in Anti-Poaching Agreements


The U.S. Department of Justice today announced that it has ordered Apple, Google, and four other companies to refrain from entering into "no solicitation" agreements in which companies agree not to actively seek to hire each other's employees.

The Department of Justice announced today that it has reached a settlement with six high technology companies - Adobe Systems Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corp., Intuit Inc. and Pixar - that prevents them from entering into no solicitation agreements for employees. The department said that the agreements eliminated a significant form of competition to attract highly skilled employees, and overall diminished competition to the detriment of affected employees who were likely deprived of competitively important information and access to better job opportunities.

The Department of Justice has filed an antitrust complaint accompanied by the proposed settlement in order to formalize the agreement. Among the agreements cited by the Department of Justice are Apple's deals with Google, Adobe, and Pixar to prevent the companies from "directly soliciting" each other's employees.

- Beginning no later than 2006, Apple and Google executives agreed not to cold call each other's employees. Apple placed Google on its internal "Do Not Call List," which instructed employees not to directly solicit employees from the listed companies. Similarly, Google listed Apple among the companies that had special agreements with Google and were part of the "Do Not Cold Call" list;
- Beginning no later than May 2005, senior Apple and Adobe executives agreed not to cold call each other's employees. Apple placed Adobe on its internal "Do Not Call List" and similarly, Adobe included Apple in its internal list of "Companies that are off limits";
- Beginning no later than April 2007, Apple and Pixar executives agreed not to cold call each other's employees. Apple placed Pixar on its internal "Do Not Call List" and senior executives at Pixar instructed human resources personnel to adhere to the agreement and maintain a paper trail;

The report calls the agreements "broader than reasonably necessary" for the purposes of collaboration between companies and notes that they were "formed and actively managed" by senior executives at the companies involved.

The proposed settlement would bar the named companies from engaging in anticompetitive no solicitation agreements for a period of five years and extend beyond the "cold calling" practice typically covered in those agreements to include other forms of solicitation and recruiting. The companies will also be required to maintain records of their compliance.

One week ago, news broke that a settlement was under discussion as all sides fought to avoid a court battle over the issue. Apple's no solicitation agreements came into the spotlight last August when it was revealed that Apple and Google had such a deal and that Apple CEO Steve Jobs had approached Palm about a similar deal.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

19 months ago
Wow. That'll be easy to police. Who are the DoJ trying to kid?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Good. Let the government do some more spanking like in music deals.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
I usually hate this crap, but this i agree with. The workers with skills should be courted by the company that can pay them the most. If the company currently employing them doesn't like that, they can damn well pay them more.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Did they order them to stop, or did they reach an agreement? Those aren't really the same thing...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Good, but this will be hard to enforce. You're also not legally allowed to "blacklist" an employee either, but I have a friend who's been trying to leave Apple for weeks now and they've directly threatened to blacklist him if he leaves before his project is completed (which is months from now). So, he either takes his dream job offer at another place, along with the promise of never working in the industry again, or he stays with Apple until they let him go and the dream job offer is no longer on the table.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
I think the do not call lists were a good thing. If person A works for Google writing code for the music store, then they come to Apple to write music store code, It would be very hard for Apple to know they were not getting Google code.

This was a way to protect against accidental IP theft.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
This really stinks. I'll bet they will establish another bureaucracy to "enforce" this display of preventing employers from getting their people to honor their contracts.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago

Good, but this will be hard to enforce. You're also not legally allowed to "blacklist" an employee either, but I have a friend who's been trying to leave Apple for weeks now and they've directly threatened to blacklist him if he leaves before his project is completed (which is months from now). So, he either takes his dream job offer at another place, along with the promise of never working in the industry again, or he stays with Apple until they let him go and the dream job offer is no longer on the table.


This sounds like a bad project manager. He should take it up the food chain.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Steve Jobs must be so mad. His fascist grip is only technically weakened. At least he doesn't have to worry about someone wanting to pilfer Jonny I've.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
How does Anti-Poaching agreements hinder competition? They don't stop the employees from quitting from Apple to go work for Google. They just don't allow Google to actively try to persuade said employee to leave Apple and join Google. I find poaching to be a disgusting practice( especially if said companies have close ties in a partnership, etc).
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]