Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple and FutureTap Resolve Questions Over Travel Patent Application

Last week, we reported on a controversy sparked by Apple's inclusion of a screenshot of a third-party developer's app interface in a patent application published late last month. While we noted at the time that the screenshot was used by Apple as interface example for taking advantage of Apple's suggested travel information service and that the company was not trying to patent anything specific to the pre-existing application, questions still remained about Apple's behavior in the matter.


Where To? screenshot (left) and drawing from Apple patent application (right)

The third-party developer in question, FutureTap, has posted an update revealing that it has received an explanation from Apple regarding the screenshot usage. Following on discussions between Apple and FutureTap, Apple's patent attorney writes:

As discussed, Apple is contemplating steps to attribute the screenshot in the patent application to FutureTap. The patent application in question does not claim as inventive the pictured user interface nor the general concept of an integrated travel services application. We appreciate your taking time out to discuss the matter and will keep you updated.

FutureTap's Ortwin Gentz notes that the explanation is clearly satisfactory, and while acknowledging that ignorance of patent law was the source of much of the confusion on the part of himself and others, sees the positive aspect of Apple's inclusion of FutureTap's screenshot in its application.

We feel honored over this mention and appreciate that Apple is looking into a proper attribution of the screenshot. In retrospective, I can say we wouldn't ever have considered the story alarming had the screenshot included a short attribution notice.

In his defense, Gentz rhetorically asks with a sense of humor whether users would "prefer developers who love reading patents over the ones who love to design user interfaces". (In the interest of full disclosure, Where To? was initially designed by developers John Casasanta and Sophia Teutschler at tap tap tap.)

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

20 months ago
Using in the first place, without asking, with attribution, remains an unacceptable move by Apple.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
*Queue Java the Hutt theme*
They are guilty! Hang them from the highest tree! I got the rope right here!!!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
This was not a good move for sure.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
They would sort this out sooner or later.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Ok, one more time.... they didn't USE anything. It would be like if I was patenting the automobile and for what it looked like I attached a picture of a horse and buggy with the horse cut out of the picture. That doesn't mean I'm trying to patent the carriage maker's carriage!!!!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Its like a newsgasm.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Never made any sense for this to be the evil Apple conspiracy it was painted to be. Seems silly, bad form and basically dumb that Apple wouldn't have referenced the app and developer that the drawing was based on, but it's not like Apple had a chance in hell of ever patenting the UI then going back on the developer and demanding royalties. Apple would have been laughed out of court if they tried, to say nothing of the PR catastrophe such an attempt would have been.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
In reality, that interface looks like a iPod Classic interface with icons on it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago

It would be like if I was patenting the automobile and for what it looked like I attached a picture of a horse and buggy with the horse cut out of the picture.


You would still need to seek permission from the copyright holder of the horse and buggy picture to use it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago

Using in the first place, without ask.

the corporate morality police mentality drives me craaaahhhazy.
maybe bone up on patent submissions, maybe read through a few hundred. maybe notice imagery. and maybe, just maybe, notice that the image enclosed with the patent specs is not at all considered in granting the patent, nor is it assumed that the image will, in any way, be part of the product.
if you're REALLY interested in patents, which i don't think for a minute you are, maybe stop wagging your finger and find out how it works, not just assume you're opinion has any bearing on reality....honestly...mac rumors has a lot of good technical topics, smart developers and engineers and users who contribute to learning more. the kinds of comments that drag it into a perez hilton expose sort of site, don't contribute to the quality of thought out comments. sorry to ramble, but i have coworkers who just love to judge and pounce, then disappear then it turns out they had no idea what they were talking about....gggrrr...and no, you wouldn not need permission to use their pic in a patent submission. i really would like to see the source of your charges.

Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]