Got a tip for us? Share it...

Wall Street Journal Profiles Apple's Board of Directors

The Wall Street Journal publishes a profile (subscription required) of Apple's Board of Directors, focusing on the lack of independent executives on the board in the wake of Jerry York's death last week. The report notes that Apple CEO Steve Jobs holds a remarkable amount of sway over both the company operations in general and specifically the Board of Directors that is supposed to help guide the company, a situation that many investors have seen as undesirable.

Investors have long urged Apple's directors to be more independent of the company's powerful CEO, even as Apple has continued posting strong financial results. An independent board represents the interests of shareholders and can challenge the CEO when necessary, said David Nadler, a corporate governance expert and senior partner at consultants Oliver Wyman Group.

Mr. York's successor should be somebody "with sufficient stature and importance to take the CEO on," said Roderick Hills, a former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, who has led a dozen audit committees.

York joined Apple's Board of Directors in 1997 when Steve Jobs took on the "interim" CEO title after the ousting of Gil Amelio in a boardroom coup. Jobs blamed much of Apple's troubles on the existing board and demanded that the majority of them resign, allowing new directors such as York to come on board to help achieve Jobs' vision.

Today's report notes that Apple's directors have rarely challenged Jobs in boardroom meetings, even when many of them disagreed with his handling of his medical leave of absence for a liver transplant during the first half of 2009. York was reportedly "disgusted" that Jobs failed to reveal his medical issues in Apple's announcement that Jobs would not present at its final Macworld Expo keynote in January 2009, with York even contemplating stepping down from Apple's board over the incident.

Looking forward, it seems likely that Apple will seek to add at least one more member to its Board of Directors, as the current count of six members is now among the smallest of Fortune 500 companies following York's death and the resignation of Google CEO Eric Schmidt in August 2009. Apple, however, has made no public signs that it has begun the process of searching for new members for its Board.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

25 months ago
Apple Board of Directors Unite!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
Dictatorship, don't like anyone telling them what to do. I figure he has to find people that will fall in step with his way. :D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
Don't get me wrong, I love most Apple products and think Steve Jobs is a genius -- if a bit quirky -- but Apple is very much a reflection of his vision, and I don't think a truly independent board is anywhere on his list of priorities. As long as the stock does well, no one's going to rock the boat.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago

Don't get me wrong, I love most Apple products and think Steve Jobs is a genius -- if a bit quirky -- but Apple is very much a reflection of his vision, and I don't think a truly independent board is anywhere on his list of priorities. As long as the stock does well, no one's going to rock the boat.


can I get an amen. :D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago

Don't get me wrong, I love most Apple products and think Steve Jobs is a genius -- if a bit quirky -- but Apple is very much a reflection of his vision, and I don't think a truly independent board is anywhere on his list of priorities. As long as the stock does well, no one's going to rock the boat.


And when he's gone, what happens then? It is naive to believe that one man will exist to run a company forever, and Jobs should eventually start thinking about how Apple will run without him. You saw what happened when he left the first time, and I doubt he wants a repeat of that.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
"a situation that many investors have seen as undesirable."

right. bring back gil amelio!

because steve keeps making all those stupid, unprofitable decisions.... :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
AAPL closed above $229 today.

Makes it a bit difficult for shareholders to complain.

:D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
So, Uncle Stevie, in the name of "good corporate governance" is going to voluntarily add more independent board members to his company so that they can kick him out of his own company...AGAIN?!?!?

Dream on, people. As long as the Apple continues raking in the dough, which it seems poised to do for the forseeable future, investors will make waves every now and then about lack of board independence. However, no real change will happen unless the stock price tanks for some reason.

Uncle Stevie and :apple: FTW
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago

AAPL closed above $229 today.

Makes it a bit difficult for shareholders to complain.


Only if they sell all their AAPL today.

If they expect continued returns, they should be very concerned about the governance of the company.

The post-Jobs era is coming. Sooner or (hopefully) later - but it's coming. Investors should be concerned about the long term issues.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago

And when he's gone, what happens then? It is naive to believe that one man will exist to run a company forever, and Jobs should eventually start thinking about how Apple will run without him. You saw what happened when he left the first time, and I doubt he wants a repeat of that.


Nor will we get a repeat of that. We saw last year Tim Cook temporarily taking over and doing just fine. So clearly Jobs HAS been thinking about how Apple will run without him.

It's good to get a strong and independent board, but no investor in the company is displeased with the stock results. Sometimes I think competitors want someone on the board to overrule Jobs just so Apple does less well.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]