Got a tip for us? Share it...

Steve Jobs Named World's Best-Performing CEO by Harvard Business Review


As part of its January 2010 issue, the Harvard Business Review released its list of the top-performing CEOs in the world, placing Apple CEO Steve Jobs first among CEOs ranked by performance throughout their tenures.

The #1 CEO on the list, Steve Jobs, delivered a whopping 3,188% industry-adjusted return (34% compounded annually) after he rejoined Apple as CEO in 1997, when the company was in dire shape. From that time until the end of September 2009, Apples market value increased by $150 billion.


The study included 1,999 CEOs who assumed their positions no earlier than 1995 and measured shareholder return as the key metric, with corrections included for general country-specific and/or industry-wide performance gains. A number of prominent CEOs, such as Microsoft's Bill Gates and Oracle's Larry Ellison, were not included in the study because they took office prior to the 1995 cutoff.

Our ranking combines three measures: country-adjusted return, industry-adjusted return, and change in market capitalization during tenure. Of course, shareholder return is not the only measure of performance, and it omits contributions companies make to a wide group of stakeholders. But it is the fundamental scorecard for CEOs of public companies. And it's the same scorecard for everyone.

In analyzing the data to attempt to discern qualities common to the most successful leaders, the report found that while country and industry affiliations had little affect on performance, the most successful CEOs tended to be company insiders, hold MBAs, and have taken over struggling companies.

Jobs was followed in the rankings by Yun Jong-Yong of Samsung, Alexey Miller of Russian natural gas giant Gazprom, John Chambers of Cisco, and Mukesh Ambani of Indian conglomerate Reliance Industries.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

28 months ago
The Gazprom CEO making the list is a tad bit...concerning.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago
re-hiring steve jobs was probably the best move that any company has ever done throughout corporate history.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago
The man had great vision and plan!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago
Ah how I love Jobs. I'm scared to know where Apple would be at if he hadn't returned in '97. I'm pretty sure he still would have been first even if Gates was put into the list of possible CEOs.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago
Strange... the report didn't even explain why they arbitrarily picked 1995 as the cut-off year.

Was it so their favorite CEOs could float to the top?

Or would it have all turned out the same way? If so, why not include the older guys?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago
He is definitely one to emulate.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago
Congrats, Steve!

I love this part.... MBA: no.

I'm sure the grad school counselors just hate that.

:^)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago
Sweet. Congrats bud!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago

Ah how I love Jobs. I'm scared to know where Apple would be at if he hadn't returned in '97. I'm pretty sure he still would have been first even if Gates was put into the list of possible CEOs.


I'd venture to guess that the question many shareholders would have had wouldn't be "where Apple would be" if he hadn't returned, but rather "whether Apple would still be."
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
28 months ago
I'm surprised that the CEO of Air Asia isn't in the list, as they've expanded hugely since I first flew with them, they are one of the only long-distance budget airlines still in business (and they even kept expanding through the recession), and they are ridiculously cheap and they make a profit too (which for the airline industry is a nice change).

They probably aren't big enough (yet) to qualify though as they only made $40 million last quarter.

EDIT: And the CEO only started the company in 2001.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]