Got a tip for us? Share it...

Intel's Larrabee Graphics Chip Delayed Indefinitely

ArsTechnica reports that Intel's Larrabee graphics chip technology has been delayed indefinitely:

Specifically, Larrabee v1 is so delayed that, at the time it eventually launches, it just won't be competitive as a discrete graphics part, so Intel plans to wring some value out of it by putting it out as a test-bed for doing multicore graphics and supercomputing development. Intel will eventually put out a GPU, but may not be the one we've been calling "Larrabee" for the past few years.

Larrabee had been the codename for a new graphics card technology that would compete head to head with NVidia and ATI. Larrabee had a unique hybrid design that was said to scale incredibly well with multiple cores. Apple's Snow Leopard was well poised to take advantage of this multi-core design and Apple had been rumored to be planning on adopting the chip upon its release:

And I've heard from a source that I trust that Apple will use Larrabee; this makes sense, because Larrabee, as a many-core x86 multiprocessor, can be exploited directly by GrandCentral's cooperative multitasking capabilities.

Obviously, with this development, we're not going to be seeing this technology in Macs anytime soon. In fact, Intel is not even planning on announcing details about their followup graphics product until 2010.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

29 months ago
Not good news. Just goes to show that it isn't easy to design a top quality graphics chip. There is a learning curve here. Even for experienced CPU designers.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
Shame, the more competitors, the better?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
One word: Wow.

I knew they were struggling a bit getting traction under Larrabee, but I didn't quite understand the situation as well as I thought, I guess.

More competition is always better, so its a loss from that perspective.

It's also odd with Intel's strained relationship with NVidia, I figured part of the reason for that was Larrabee. Apparently not.

I can see it being released in future on an OpenCL compatible add-on card. That could be killer stuck in an Xserve or MacPro, doing high-end video work. It would also obviate the need for a "mature software stack" in order for the technology to be useful.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
So what does this mean for macs and graphics for 2010, with the whole Nvidia not getting licenses and such ?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
Waiting for info on the "new Larrabee."

I can see it being released in future on an OpenCL compatible add-on card. That could be killer stuck in an Xserve or MacPro, doing high-end video work. It would also obviate the need for a "mature software stack" in order for the technology to be useful.

I can also see that happening.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago

So what does this mean for macs and graphics for 2010, with the whole Nvidia not getting licenses and such ?


The Nvidia thing shouldn't affect much with respect to graphics as that's an issue with the chipset. Apple is still free to use their graphics cards in their computers.

arn
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
Wow. This means were not going to see Larrabee in macs for a very long time. If Intel is delaying it so long, its obvious when it comes out it will be sluggish behind other GPUs.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
yep, you can't just walk in and be better than ATI or NVIDEA. They have years of GPU experience.

Well, I hope that Intel still makes progress in providing eventually a great integrated solution that can make up for the 9400. The future a light notebooks or netbooks and there integrated GPU's is the future.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago

Not good news. Just goes to show that it isn't easy to design a top quality graphics chip. There is a learning curve here. Even for experienced CPU designers.


We don't know the constraints under which the engineers had to work. Intel is a CPU seller first and foremost. They don't want anything they sell to allow you to use a cheaper CPU (many systems nowadays only need graphics card updates to stay competitive). Anything coming out of Intel will be processor dependent. See USB vs. Firewire.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
This could mean that Intel is buying Nvidia now. Strategically, it would be a wise move for both companies.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]