Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Launches New Environmental Publicity Initiative

BusinessWeek reports that Apple has launched an expanded environmental section of its website to offer extensive information on the company's green initiatives and provide a closer look at the environmental impact of its products over their complete life cycles, from raw materials to customer usage to recycling.

Apple, which has received criticism from environmental groups such as Greenpeace over its environmental impact, is hoping to change the way companies are judged on those issues to include actions instead of promises and to look at the full impact of both production and usage.

"A lot of companies publish how green their building is, but it doesn't matter if you're shipping millions of power-hungry products with toxic chemicals in them," says CEO Steve Jobs in an interview. "It's like asking a cigarette company how green their office is."

Apple notes that 53% of the company's greenhouse gas emissions comes from customer usage of its products, placing focus on its efforts to reduce power consumption through a variety of methods. Apple also notes that it is the only company in its industry to have its entire computer product line certified as Energy Star compliant.

The company is also highlighting extensive reports on the environmental impact of each model it sells , noting the reduction and elimination of a number of toxic chemicals from its products.

The company is disclosing new product information, as well as overall carbon emissions. Apple will document on the new Web site data that it ended the use of controversial polyvinyl chlorides (PVCs) and bromide flame retardants (BFRs) in its devices last year. HP and Dell had promised to do the same by 2009, but recently pushed that back. Apple is also going further and pushing suppliers to get rid of bromine and chlorine, the harmful ingredients in PVCs and BFRs.

Apple's increased willingness to share environmental information and changes to its practices have started to turn the tide in the eyes of several environmental groups. The Carbon Disclosure Project recently gave Apple a score of 73 out of 100 for the breadth and depth of its public disclosures, whereas the company scored only a rating of 7 in 2008.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

31 months ago
Apple always does a great job when it comes watching their impact to the environment. More companies need to get on the ball because this rock, for now atleast, is the only one we have to live on.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
Can someone who voted negative on this article please explain why?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
it took a bit too long, but it looks like Apple now "gets it" and really wants to be a leader on this front. Congratulations are in order !!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
Also: 1 recycled liver.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago

A lot of companies publish how green their building is, but it doesn't matter if you're shipping millions of power-hungry products with toxic chemicals in them


I wonder if that's a dig at a certain company who's just opened a big data centre in Ireland, with state of the art passive cooling etc.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
Wow, this is really nice to hear. It's good that more companies are now thinking about the environmental impact of their products. I long for the day when Apple's computers start running on renewable energy. :apple: :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago

Can someone who voted negative on this article please explain why?


Some people are tired of hearing about Environmentalism. And having "green" products shoved down our throats. So there is an automatic reflex to see anything to do with this concept as a negative. Especially when most Green products are a joke.

If you truly believe in the impact of these products on the environment and that you should do something about it. Then you should not use any of them at all.

Not as bad does not equal good. From a purely environmental standpoint anything you do that has more impact than a Deer or Wolf is bad.

Now I do believe in recycling as it makes sense. Why dig up more stuff when it can be re-utilized? But for global warming I have not seen compelling enough evidence that the temperature fluctuations are greater than what is natural. On other environmental issues my opinion varies.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago

Can someone who voted negative on this article please explain why?


I never vote + or - on these articles, but I suspect that any negative votes are directed more towards the extremist policies of these "environmental groups" that are basically strong-arming Apple to publicly expand on these types of programs (from a PR standpoint).

As Jobs once said, he's always had policies in effect, but not disclosing them got them in trouble by these activists. I personally think it's ridiculous. I'm all for Apple (or any company) genuinely doing what they can to reduce emissions, but having a bunch of wingnuts dictate that for you is lame.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago

Some people are tired of hearing about Environmentalism. And having "green" products shoved down our throats. So there is an automatic reflex to see anything to do with this concept as a negative. Especially when most Green products are a joke.


Agreed. I'm pretty tired of hearing about it. I guess I'm "part of the problem". Oh well, I guess just shoot me to save the planet.

Although, I am glad that when mountains of iPods and iPhones are burned in open pits by Chinese children looking for bits of gold, they will be exposed to fewer heavy metals and toxic chemicals.

Maybe they should stop using gold...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
What would be better is if they made it easier for the customer to repair there product, for example being able to replace a battery in a ipod.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]