Apple Launches New Environmental Publicity Initiative
Apple, which has received criticism from environmental groups such as Greenpeace over its environmental impact, is hoping to change the way companies are judged on those issues to include actions instead of promises and to look at the full impact of both production and usage.
"A lot of companies publish how green their building is, but it doesn't matter if you're shipping millions of power-hungry products with toxic chemicals in them," says CEO Steve Jobs in an interview. "It's like asking a cigarette company how green their office is."
Apple notes that 53% of the company's greenhouse gas emissions comes from customer usage of its products, placing focus on its efforts to reduce power consumption through a variety of methods. Apple also notes that it is the only company in its industry to have its entire computer product line certified as Energy Star compliant.The company is also highlighting extensive reports on the environmental impact of each model it sells , noting the reduction and elimination of a number of toxic chemicals from its products.
The company is disclosing new product information, as well as overall carbon emissions. Apple will document on the new Web site data that it ended the use of controversial polyvinyl chlorides (PVCs) and bromide flame retardants (BFRs) in its devices last year. HP and Dell had promised to do the same by 2009, but recently pushed that back. Apple is also going further and pushing suppliers to get rid of bromine and chlorine, the harmful ingredients in PVCs and BFRs.
Apple's increased willingness to share environmental information and changes to its practices have started to turn the tide in the eyes of several environmental groups. The Carbon Disclosure Project recently gave Apple a score of 73 out of 100 for the breadth and depth of its public disclosures, whereas the company scored only a rating of 7 in 2008.Top Rated Comments
(View all)A lot of companies publish how green their building is, but it doesn't matter if you're shipping millions of power-hungry products with toxic chemicals in them
I wonder if that's a dig at a certain company who's just opened a big data centre in Ireland, with state of the art passive cooling etc.
Can someone who voted negative on this article please explain why?
Some people are tired of hearing about Environmentalism. And having "green" products shoved down our throats. So there is an automatic reflex to see anything to do with this concept as a negative. Especially when most Green products are a joke.
If you truly believe in the impact of these products on the environment and that you should do something about it. Then you should not use any of them at all.
Not as bad does not equal good. From a purely environmental standpoint anything you do that has more impact than a Deer or Wolf is bad.
Now I do believe in recycling as it makes sense. Why dig up more stuff when it can be re-utilized? But for global warming I have not seen compelling enough evidence that the temperature fluctuations are greater than what is natural. On other environmental issues my opinion varies.
Can someone who voted negative on this article please explain why?
I never vote + or - on these articles, but I suspect that any negative votes are directed more towards the extremist policies of these "environmental groups" that are basically strong-arming Apple to publicly expand on these types of programs (from a PR standpoint).
As Jobs once said, he's always had policies in effect, but not disclosing them got them in trouble by these activists. I personally think it's ridiculous. I'm all for Apple (or any company) genuinely doing what they can to reduce emissions, but having a bunch of wingnuts dictate that for you is lame.
Some people are tired of hearing about Environmentalism. And having "green" products shoved down our throats. So there is an automatic reflex to see anything to do with this concept as a negative. Especially when most Green products are a joke.
Agreed. I'm pretty tired of hearing about it. I guess I'm "part of the problem". Oh well, I guess just shoot me to save the planet.
Although, I am glad that when mountains of iPods and iPhones are burned in open pits by Chinese children looking for bits of gold, they will be exposed to fewer heavy metals and toxic chemicals.
Maybe they should stop using gold...
[ Read All Comments ]

Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...