Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Publicly Responds to FCC Inquiry, Comments on Google Voice App Status

As noted earlier today, Apple was expected to file comments with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission regarding their purported rejection of the Google Voice iPhone application. Apple has complied and published their response to the FCC in the Hot News section of Apple.com.

Starting off with background information on the iPhone and the App Store, Apple notes that the App Store now "offers over 65,000 iPhone applications, and customers have downloaded over 1.5 billion applications" and that it has "fostered competition as other companies (e.g., Nokia, Microsoft, RIM, Palm and Verizon) seek to develop their own mobile platforms and launch their own application stores." In describing the App Store approval process, criteria that serves to "protect consumer privacy, safeguard children from inappropriate content, and avoid applications that degrade the core experience of the iPhone" are listed and most rejections are based on bugs, with attempts made to provide feedback to the developer to help them improve it and increase the chances of an app's approval afterward.

In response to the question about the rejection of the Google Voice app, Apple states:

"Contrary to published reports, Apple has not rejected the Google Voice application, and continues to study it. The application has not been approved because, as submitted for review, it appears to alter the iPhones distinctive user experience by replacing the iPhones core mobile telephone functionality and Apple user interface with its own user interface for telephone calls, text messaging and voicemail. Apple spent a lot of time and effort developing this distinct and innovative way to seamlessly deliver core functionality of the iPhone."

Additionally, the response describes how the Google Voice application fails to make use of the Visual Voicemail feature and the native Messaging app, as well as the fact that it uploads a user's Contacts list to Google's servers with no "assurances from Google that this data will only be used in appropriate ways." Apple commits that it is still "continuing to study the Google Voice application and its potential impact on the iPhone user experience."

Regarding the role of AT&T in relation to the Google Voice app, Apple clearly explains that AT&T has no role in the app approval process, nor does anything in Apple's contract with AT&T have any bearing in this situation. It is noted, however, that the agreement with AT&T does require Apple to not "include functionality in any Apple phone that enables a customer to use AT&Ts cellular network service to originate or terminate a VoIP session without obtaining AT&Ts permission," which clearly provides the reasoning behind the Wi-Fi-only functionality of the Skype VOIP app and other similar apps.

Apple's response to Question 6 provides further details on the app approval process, describing that there are "40 full-time trained reviewers" and that "at least two different reviewers study each application so that the review process is applied uniformly." Apple also reveals there is also an executive review board that oversees policies and procedures and reviews apps escalated because they "raise new or complex issues."

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

32 months ago
Holy hell....only 40 full time reviewers? No wonder things take eons to get approved or denied.

I see Apple coming out of this with a major black eye from the FCC. I've been pretty impressed with the "new" FCC so far...hopefully they keep the pressure on companies to not bend the rules as they see fit.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
Seems like a lot of BS to me. IF this is true, why did they approve GV Mobile and countless other applications for Google Voice, only to pull them later? :confused:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
Apple answered that by not answering it at all
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
As crappy as BREW and its app store are, it's a bit disingenuous for Apple to claim that Verizon and Qualcomm have been copying from them, seeing as how those elements of BREW existed long before Apple had even added video and third-party games to the iPod.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
They didn't respond to the question of why they pulled the other 3 apps.

Though this google app does sounds like it changes... ALOT more then it really needed too...

Though the most eye opening things... 40 people looking at 8500 apps a week. Thats 10 and 1/2 mins per each app *if 2 people look at each app once* It seems like they have about 1/3 the amount of staffing they need ;\
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
"Contrary to published reports, Apple has not rejected the Google Voice application, and continues to study it."

"Continues to study it???" What the heck is Google Voice, an alien lifeform??? :rolleyes:

This PR spin oozes lameness.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
Only my 5cent, but i used to be a PocketPC user, and i installed a bunch of apps, most of them crashed my device, some of them soo buggy, i am actually happy that there is some quality control!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
Its an interesting read, but IMO somewhat flawed. Isn't it true that GV and the third party apps only dial through the regular phone and not VOIP? And even if it did use VOIP, why doesn't it work over wifi? I'm sure its not as complicated as Apple makes it out to be.

I could accept that it was because it duplicates core functionality, but they need to come out and say that instead of muddying the waters.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
AT&T is all "It wasn't us. We don't have any say in the matter."

Apple is all "We don't want to *confuse* people by offering an alternative dialer, text messaging, or voicemail app."

Yeah, right. Confuse people by offering them a choice.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
I'm seriously tired of seeing this issue appear in almost every one of my Google Reader tech feeds. Ho-hum. Apple's response seemed straightforward and reasonable. I'm sure if Google modifies the application, it will eventually be accepted. I really can't see why the FCC is involved. What a big fat waste of time for all involved.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]