Got a tip for us? Share it...

More Rumors of Limited Third-Party Background Apps Coming to the iPhone? [Updated]

Silicon Alley Insider has heard some rumors that seem to corroborate MacRumors' report from February that Apple is working on allowing limited background processes in a future version of the iPhone's operating system. Our sources had told us they would be limited to one or two additional processes, while Silicon Alley Insider suggests that it could alternatively be for specifically-approved apps.

Here's two potential scenarios we've heard. Treat these as anecdotal rumors for now, as we don't know how realistic they are.

* Apple might allow users to select two apps that can run in the background.
* Apple might selectively allow some apps to run in the background. We assume that developers could apply for permission to run in the background, and that Apple might approve or deny them based on the resources they need and how well they behave with the operating system's stability.

According to the report, it is not known whether this feature could make an appearance in iPhone OS 3.0 due this summer or if it might be under development for a later release.

In a blog post discussing Silicon Alley Insider's report, John Gruber writes that he has also heard rumblings about a similar feature:

Ordinarily I wouldn't link to something as sketchily sourced as this, but: I heard something very similar from a decent (but second-hand) source back in January during Macworld Expo. What I heard then was that Apple was working on a vastly improved dock for your most-frequently used apps, and that thered be one special icon position where you could put a third-party app to enable it to run in the background.

Citing concerns over the effect of having applications run in the background on battery life, Apple is officially planning to deploy push notifications as a substitute for backgrounding, allowing delivery of alerts for applications that are not actively running.

Update: TechCrunch chimes in with additional corroboration:

Basically, my source says that while this is in no way a done deal yet, Apple is definitely trying to come up with a way to offer background support for third-party apps. They went on to note that while Apple may have something to say about it at WWDC, it's very unlikely that any solution would be ready at that time, and could be a situation similar to how Apple announced Push Notification at WWDC last year but said it was coming in a few months (which it later was delayed until iPhone 3.0).

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

36 months ago
Hopefully.


But not going to happen
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago
If this would enable multitasking, I'm all over it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago
persistent real-time MMO anyone?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago
iPhone OS 4.0 with revamped GUI on the home screen is what I would say! :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago

persistent real-time MMO anyone?


Anyone?

*chirp chirp*

I don't think so. I'd rather have Things alert me of tasks due, or Pandora play in the background.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago
I would love to have the option to allow one or two apps to operate in the background. I just want to be able to run Pandora or MLB app and be able to do something else at the same time.

Apple usually has a "We know best" attitude and sometimes deny options/choices to their customers. hopefully this indicates a small change in that attitude. Really, I'm not an idiot. Put a little warning that says that running background processes will result in lower battery life and let me determine if lower battery life is worth the tradeoff for increased functionality.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago
I don't get apple's theories. They say they won't due to battery-life drain. Well make it so we can enable if we so choose to let an app run in the background.

Of course a game app I wouldn't want to risk running in the background, but if we as the consumer are willing to accept the batterydrain so we can run apps like Aim or Pandora in the background, we so should be allowed to!!

I hate listening to Pandora and having to quit to answer a text msg, argh.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago

Anyone?

*chirp chirp*

I don't think so. I'd rather have Things alert me of tasks due, or Pandora play in the background.


Oh ok well, I guess MMO is out as there is only room for one potential use for background apps.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago
Yes, multitasking would be great.... and I would love to see an easy way that you could switch between the open applications without having to wait for them to load to make the iPhone more functional. (like using :apple: + TAB on Macs)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
36 months ago
I'd have no problem with Apple certifying certain apps as background-able.

However I'd like to see how well the alerts system works with 3.0, as well as the ability to still turn off background apps on a per-app basis.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]