Got a tip for us? Share it...

Early MacBook and MacBook Pro Benchmarks

Primate Labs publishes new benchmark tests comparing the new MacBook (Late 2008) and MacBook Pro (Late 2008) to their predecessors. These benchmarks measure both processor and memory performance but do not appear to measure graphics capabilities (GPUs) which should be clearly improved in the new machines.

The findings show very little improvements in both processor and memory performance in the new laptops. Processor performance was unlikely to be greatly impacted as the processors remained much the same between the revisions. In theory, memory access should have been improved with bus speeds increasing to 1066MHz in the newest models, but it appears in practice the improvements are minimal.

Of course, real use performance of these new notebooks will be improved due to the faster graphics cards. In fact, ArsTechnica posts some early impressions from the new MacBook Pros and were impressed by its performance:

It's important to note here that, while no serious gamer is going to be trading in his or her main gaming machine for a MacBook Pro any time soon, this level of performance in such a compact form-factor and at this price-point is pretty impressive. The new MacBook Pro is definitely up to the task of gaming on the road or for use at LAN parties when lugging around a desktop machine finally starts making your back hurt.

Another early set of benchmarks from PCMag actually showed dramatic increases in 3D benchmarks even when compared to other PC laptops with the same graphics hardware. This original led some people to believe that both GPUs were being used. This has since been denied by NVIDIA. The discrepancy is hard to explain, however, so we may have to wait for more benchmarks to believe these dramatic gains.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

43 months ago
The benchmarch for the Macbook Firewire is 0mb/s...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Given the specs, were we really expecting much of a performance difference?

It is pretty apparent this redesign is more about the fabrication of the hardware, more than anything. Which is cool. Just saying...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
It's all about graphics performance this go around.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
This is why it's insane to update to the very next revision. Users should wait for the second or third at the very least. Or, just wait until they really need it.

The biggest improvement in my opinion will come in build quality. After having finally touched one of the new cases today, I have to say it's the best built machine I have seen Apple make since the MBA.

pgifford, very very true. I know that 12" PowerBook users now have a somewhat better choice in notebook now that the MacBook has backlit keys and dedicated graphics. May not be the same size and weight, but it's a worthy book IMHO.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
So, graphics aside, my 1-year-old 17" 2.6 still rates higher.

I don't feel so horrible now. :D :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Does Intel not have any faster chips from when the Early 2008 models were released?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
I got the new one for the graphics performance, LED LCD, new keyboard, and the new design.

Awesome laptop.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago

Does Intel not have any faster chips from when the Early 2008 models were released?


The MBP(Not sure about the Macbooks) processor was updated to Intel's Montevina, apparently it didn't help much. It probably helped in battery life.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
"Somewhat suprisingly, processor performance is virtually unchanged in the new MacBooks and MacBook Pros; the new NVIDIA chipset and the faster DDR3 memory haven’t managed to help increase processor performance." from Primelabs...

So if it's not faster... Then all Apple did was take things away LIKE FIREWIRE and give us a better case???
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
This is great news.

I needed a laptop, bought the pro for graphics capabilities, and am glad that the results of these tests back up my reasons for going with it. I didn't expect faster processing, as I didn't opt for the high end processor to begin with ;) .

Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]