Got a tip for us? Share it...

First Customer Receives Psystar Mac Clone

Gizmodo posts the first video evidence of the existence of the Psystar OpenComputer in the wild. One of their readers who actually received their OpenComputer and was kind enough to provide video proof. (There have been questions about the company's legitimacy.)

Reader Patrick (Whiskeyfrown) is lucky enough to be using one of the few Psystar Open Computing machines that have made it into the wild, and he was generous enough to make a video showing the machine (including the connections in the back to the monitor to show that it's legit). The thing boots up and runs pretty damn fast, says Patrick, but Software Update won't recognize it so you won't be able to patch

As we've pointed out before, the technology to run Mac OS X on non-Apple hardware has been well established, but never previously offered commercially. Psystar has specifically adapted the technology from the OSx86Project to allow Mac OS X Leopard to run on standard PC hardware. Individuals with the time and inclination could accomplish the same task on their own PC hardware. Psystar's solution, however, eliminates this technical "hands on" process.

While the advantage of purchasing from Psystar includes a potentially cheaper alternative to Apple hardware, the disadvantages remain significant, still limiting this option to the serious hobbyist. Psystar's patched installation of Leopard appears to prevent future software updates. Even if this were possible, you would run a serious risk of disabling your Mac OS X Leopard installation by installing future software updates.

Apple has remained silent about Psystar's offering, which appears to violate their End User License Agreement (EULA) prohibiting the installation of Mac OS X on non Apple-branded hardware.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

50 months ago
:rolleyes:

We'll see.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago
I am going to side with the camp of "if you really want to do it, go ahead." It is essentially hacking a box to run an apple framework. And hacking isn't terrible, so long as the copy of the software you buy is legal and you are doing it merely for yourself.

There may be an EULA, but I think when it was established (much before the possibility of intel, I'm sure), it was really a formality. If apple wanted to do something, they probably would have eaten this company alive a while ago (via a buyout, or something).
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago
Hm... Interesting that somebody actually received one.

It won't be long, now.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago
I'm a little surprised that no one has heard anything from Apple on this yet
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago
Sounds like a lot of hassle to save a few bucks.

Support? It's like buying a computer from a guy in a white van.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago
Yup,
Just a matter of time before Steve picks up the phone.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago
Not being able to upgrade, I'm pretty sure Apple will take their time in this. Maybe locking the OS in 10.5.4/5?

It's good that there is a community that wants the Mac OS... but, without the hardware, you could hardly call it a Mac. Example, when you have Windows installed on your Mac and use it primarily, you would still say, "I have a Mac"

Price of Apple Hardware has dropped in recent years, more competitive in the market. It's just a shame that it's still just a little too expensive for most peoples tastes.

Nevermind, Apple is changing however slowly :D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago
Sounds like a Vacuum.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago

Sounds like a Vacuum.


More like a jet taking off.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
50 months ago

Yup,
Just a matter of time before Steve picks up the phone.


Not necessarily, it is very likely that too few will actually buy this computer to keep this company afloat.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]