20 inch iMac Released
Apple released the 20" iMac today (Press Release).
Buy @ Apple Store, MacConnection.com, ClubMac
, MacMall.com
The new high end iMac offers a 20" widescreen LCD screen, 1.25GHz G4, 256 DDR333 SDRAM, and NVidia GeForce FX 5200 Ultra for $2199.00
iMac Line:
15" 1GHz, $1299
17" 1.25GHz, $1799
20" 1.25GHz, $2199
A couple of tidbits have filtered in on this new surprising configuration over the past month... with two reports (1, 2) finally being posted just yesterday predicting today's release. Rumors of a larger (19") iMac date back to May 2002 -- could the Chinese newspapers have been onto something?
Buy @ Apple Store, MacConnection.com, ClubMac
Top Rated Comments
(View all)
108 months ago
a little disappointing that the specs weren't beefed up at all. still i can't wait to see that in person. maybe i'll take a trip to cambridgeside at lunch...
edit: spelling
edit: spelling
108 months ago
Maybe this is a dumb question but...
If a fella had an iBook or PowerBook, could he hook it up to the monitor on that beast?
Squire
If a fella had an iBook or PowerBook, could he hook it up to the monitor on that beast?
Squire
108 months ago
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
where do you see 20" all i saw was 17.
It's on the Apple Store site right now; they'll probably update the main site later.
108 months ago
108 months ago
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
where do you see 20" all i saw was 17.
US webstore has them. UK store still down.
108 months ago
WTH is going on - there is no 20" iMac on Apple. Did you read something wrong, Arn?
108 months ago
I agree with Ambrose, you'd think that there would be more beyond just the larger screen size, such as 512 MB of memory standard or the 160 GB hard drive.
On the plus side, this does give Apple something you can't find with any other all-in-one (a number of them have 1440x900 or 1280x1024 displays).
On the plus side, this does give Apple something you can't find with any other all-in-one (a number of them have 1440x900 or 1280x1024 displays).
108 months ago
They should have at least bumped up the video hardware, and for what you're paying they could have at least used a 1.33 GHz processor. Bleh, I wish Apple would try harder with their low end stuff :rolleyes:
[ Read All Comments ]
Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...
