M5 Ultra Chip's Impressive Performance Boost Revealed in First Benchmark Result - MacRumors
Skip to Content

M5 Ultra Chip's Impressive Performance Boost Revealed in First Benchmark Result

by

The first unverified benchmark result for Apple's new M5 Ultra chip surfaced in the Geekbench 7 database today, offering a look at the chip's impressive performance gains. The new Mac Studio will be Apple's first device to be equipped with the M5 Ultra.

M5 Ultra Hero
Here is how the highest-end M5 Ultra chip with a 36-core CPU scored:

  • Single-core CPU score: 3,774
  • Multi-core CPU score: 52,516

Apple never released an M4 Ultra chip. Here are the average scores for the highest-end M3 Ultra chip with a 32-core CPU on Geekbench 7:

  • Single-core CPU score: 2,920
  • Multi-core CPU score: 39,059

Unsurprisingly, the M5 Ultra is Apple's fastest chip ever. If this Geekbench result is accurate, it has up to around 30% faster single-core CPU performance and up to around 35% faster multi-core performance compared to the M3 Ultra. But, it comes at a steep cost. In the U.S., the Mac Studio with a 36-core M5 Ultra starts at $6,799.

Apple said the M5 Ultra has up to 1.25× faster single-threaded CPU performance and up to 1.3× faster multi-threaded CPU performance compared to the M3 Ultra, so the benchmark result roughly aligns with or even beats those advertised claims. However, keep in mind that there wil be some variance in scores as additional results surface.

Here is where the M5 Ultra slots in for maximum multi-core CPU performance:

  • M5 Ultra: 52,516
  • M3 Ultra: 39,059
  • M5 Max: 35,119
  • M5 Pro: 33,593
  • M4 Max: 29,047
  • M2 Ultra: 28,789
  • M4 Pro: 24,894
  • M3 Max: 24,649
  • M1 Ultra: 23,328
  • M6: 22,783
  • M5: 17,948
  • M2 Max: 17,387
  • M3 Pro: 16,880
  • M2 Pro: 16,725
  • M4: 15,477
  • M1 Max: 14,299
  • M1 Pro: 13,914
  • M3: 11,650
  • M2: 9,809
  • M1: 8,582

Based on these scores, the M5 Ultra is up to 2.25× faster than Apple's original M1 Ultra chip and up to 6× faster compared to the regular M1 chip.

As always, real-world performance varies.

The new Mac Studio with M5 Max and M5 Ultra chips and the new Mac mini with M6 and M5 Pro chips launch on Tuesday, September 22.

We are still waiting for GPU results for the M5 Ultra to appear in the Geekbench 7 database.

Related Roundup: Mac Studio
Tags: Benchmarks, Geekbench
Buyer's Guide: Mac Studio (Buy Now)
Related Forum: Mac Studio

Popular Stories

Mac mini vs Studio Feature Sans Text 1

Apple Caught Off Guard by AI Demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

Sunday August 30, 2026 8:52 am PDT by
Apple's unusually timed announcement of new Mac mini and Mac Studio models this week was driven by unexpectedly strong enterprise appetite for AI hardware, according to The Information. Apple normally releases new Mac models in the autumn, closer to October or November, making this week's announcement unusually early, falling just before the anticipated arrival of new iPhone models. The...
Read Full Article • 267 comments
Mac Studio Feature

Apple Seemingly Made a Mistake When Announcing the New Mac Studio

Monday August 31, 2026 11:19 am PDT by
Apple's press release for the new Mac Studio with M5 Max and M5 Ultra chips last week initially stated that the computer had "next-generation SSD architecture built on PCIe Gen 6." However, as spotted by the French blog MacGeneration, Apple removed the PCIe 6.0 mention from the announcement shortly after it was published. The press release still mentions that the new Mac Studio has a...
Read Full Article • 69 comments
iphone 18 pro

iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max Benchmarks Reveal Speed of A20 Pro Chip

Thursday September 10, 2026 4:06 am PDT by
Early benchmark results for the A20 Pro chip in the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max appeared early this morning in the Geekbench 7 database, offering us a first look at the new models' CPU and graphics performance ahead of the devices reaching customers. Based on these early results – which are unconfirmed – the A20 Pro chip across the Pro models appears to deliver around 21% to 23%...
Read Full Article • 61 comments

Top Rated Comments

Squashi Avatar
Squashi
31 minutes ago at 11:06 am
Cannot wait to play Chess on that bad boy
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
M
Makosuke
11 minutes ago at 11:27 am
Interestingly, if you look at the current Geekbench 7 browser, there is a single M6 result in there, showing a single-core score of 4071, which is the absolute top of anything in the database.

More interestingly, right underneath it in the 3980-4040 rangeare many dozens of "iPhone19,2" and "iPhone19,3" results (plus a few "iPhone19,7"), which it seems very plausible are iPhone 18 pros and Duos, although the browser amusingly identifies the CPU as "Intel Pentium II/III 4928 MHz (6 cores)". There seem to be too many of those for it to be a fake, review or test units seem far more likely.

And, given that they're the same architecture, that kinda backs the lone M6 result as being real, which would mean it's the fastest single-core CPU in existence right now.

Which, if real, shows the M6 having a plausible multi-core of 22,783. That puts it right in the M4 Pro / M3 Max range, and also tells us that the M5 Pro Mini is going to get you about 50% more multi-core performance and about 10% slower single-core.

As for this M5 Ultra result, it's still in the browser, and currently sitting at the number 5 slot on all-time Geekbench 7 multi-core CPU results. The only things above it are three 64-core Threadripper PRO 9985WX results and a single EPYC 9B45 with 192 cores.

That's a pretty fast CPU.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Joe Rossignol Avatar
Joe Rossignol
16 minutes ago at 11:22 am

It would be pretty weird if it wasn’t.
Added in an "unsurprisingly" for you ;)
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
BigMcGuire Avatar
BigMcGuire
24 minutes ago at 11:14 am

So what is better for WoW: A stronger single core M6 or M5 Pro Mac mini?
TLDR: The GPUs matter more for WoW. (Pro/Max Chips).

I have an M1 Max in a 16' MBP. It plays WoW perfectly hooked up to an Apple Studio Display. Obviously not on high.

Also I prefer WoW Classic BC Anniversary so - on medium settings I can keep 60fps easily with the M1 Max.

My M4 MacBook Air is slightly faster than my M1 Max in day to day operations but bogs down quickly when doing multiple things at once (Parallels, multiple CPU intensive tasks) whereas my M1 Max acts like it isn't even sweating.

Also the M4 MacBook Air can only do 20fps WoW Classic BC Anniversary to my Apple Studio Display and gets really hot really quick.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
decimortis Avatar
decimortis
14 minutes ago at 11:23 am
Is that the score or the price?
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)
BigMcGuire Avatar
BigMcGuire
17 minutes ago at 11:20 am

What about Classic Hardcore? Would that be even more lenient than BC?
Classic Hardcore and Vanilla ran about the same for me as BC - maybe slightly faster. I v-sync lock 60fps and my M1 Max 16' MBP stays cool so I never hear any fans lol.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Read All Comments