Got a tip for us? Share it...

New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Teardown of Apple's New AirPort Extreme Reveals Hard Drive Slot, but No Connectors

While iOS 7 and OS X Mavericks drew most of the attention at this week's Worldwide Developers Conference keynote, another one of Apple's introductions also generated a significant amount of discussion and controversy: redesigned AirPort Extreme and AirPort Time Capsule Wi-Fi base stations.

The new vertical designs take up considerably more volume than their predecessors, although footprints have been reduced to just 3.85 inches square. The new base stations include support for the latest 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard, and Apple has increased the number of antennas from three to six. The vertical design is intended to optimize range and signal strength by elevating the antennas, while also helping the base stations offer beamforming, which automatically finds 802.11ac devices and targets Wi-Fi signals toward those devices for optimum performance.

The teardown experts at iFixit have obtained one of the new AirPort Extreme units and have torn it apart to examine its internals. Given that the AirPort Extreme and AirPort Time Capsule have identical external designs, it should be no surprise that the AirPort Extreme contains space for a hard drive, although it appears that users will not be able to build their own Time Capsules by simply adding hard drives to their AirPort Extremes.
We free the top cover, only to find...3.5″ of empty space. While the AirPort Extreme doesn’t come equipped with storage, we dug up a standard 3.5″ SATA hard drive, just to test it out. Perfecto!...Except we can’t find any connectors where we’d plug in the hard drive, only empty spaces on the logic board—so chances of DIY AirPort Extreme to Time Capsule upgrades are slim.
airport_extreme_2013_open
Looking further, iFixit found the usual array of chips on the logic board, and was also able to trace the antenna cable up through the center of the device to a large plate at the top which serves to distribute the Wi-Fi signals. And overall, iFixit gives the AirPort Extreme a repairability score of 8 out of 10, citing standard Torx screws, a relative lack of glue, and modular components as positives and slightly difficult prying to open, difficult fan access, and breakage-prone connectors as negatives.

airport_extreme_2013_apart
Apple's new AirPort Extreme is priced at $199, while the AirPort Time Capsule base stations incorporating hard drives for wireless backup storage are priced at $299 for 2 TB and $399 for 3 TB.

Related roundup: AirPort

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

17 months ago
Jeez, people! Do you not READ? The tower design is to help with the antennas and the 802.11 AC performance. Stop whining and READ!
Rating: 41 Votes
17 months ago
Yea USB three is vitally important for printers and backup's while you sleep..
Rating: 18 Votes
17 months ago

No USB 3.0 because USB 2.0 is faster than the bandwidth of a wireless connection anyway.


No it isn't.

802.11ac is 1300Mbps

USB 2.0 is just 480Mbps (much less in reality)

Other manufactures are including USB 3.0 (5000Mbps) in their routers and charging less.
Rating: 17 Votes
17 months ago

They really should have made a smaller profile design instead of wasting space with the Extreme version..


They did. It's called an Airport Express.
Rating: 16 Votes
17 months ago
I bet I could fit a Raspberry Pi in there. Could make a nice little DIY NAS box.
Rating: 16 Votes
17 months ago

I still don't know what to make of the new design...


Agreed.

I've got the current shape Extreme and it's classy, yet unobtrusive.

This design is perplexing.
Rating: 11 Votes
17 months ago
No USB 3.0, No sale...

http://www.netgear.com/home/products/wirelessrouters/ultimate-performance/R6250.aspx#two (http://www.netgear.com/home/products/wirelessrouters/ultimate-performance/R6250.aspx#two)

The USB 2.0 bottleneck will mean the AirPort Extreme is pretty useless as a NAS.
Rating: 10 Votes
17 months ago

No it isn't.

802.11ac is 1300Mbps

USB 2.0 is just 480Mbps (much less in reality)


You should have put the "much less in reality" next to the WiFi standard.. you'll barely get close to 300Mbps when moving files.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/wi-fi-802.11ac-router,3386-10.html
Rating: 9 Votes
17 months ago
I like it. 6 antennas, beamforming, 802.11ac, better wireless range... I think I'll pick one up!
Rating: 9 Votes
17 months ago

No USB 3.0, No sale...

http://www.netgear.com/home/products/wirelessrouters/ultimate-performance/R6250.aspx#two (http://www.netgear.com/home/products/wirelessrouters/ultimate-performance/R6250.aspx#two)


Yep - whereas this design doesn't feel like it could be tucked away neatly - it actually feels bigger. :(


They really should have made a smaller profile design instead of wasting space with the Extreme version... I'm hoping there will be 3rd party connectors for sale later on that will let us add our own hard drives.

Also, seriously.... still only 3 ports? -_- that tower can easily fit 10 ports at least. Come on now.


The focus is on wireless.

No USB 3.0 because USB 2.0 is faster than the bandwidth of a wireless connection anyway.

The profile is to provide better wireless range and performance.

And only three wired ports because that's a secondary, edge case for this device.

I don't understand the one USB port though. This thing should be a hub for your shared printer and time machine backup drives.
Rating: 8 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]