Got a tip for us? Share it...

Notes on Sixth-Generation iPod Nano: Teardown, Video Playback Hints, Photo Slideshows, Voice Memos

After the flurry of news yesterday about the iPod touch, we're now turning our attention to the new sixth-generation iPod nano, which has seen a number of minor tidbits revealed since it began making its way into the hands of consumers.


- iFixit has completed the trifecta with a teardown of the new iPod nano, following up on its iPod touch and iPod shuffle teardowns. The iPod nano offers a similar layout to the iPod shuffle, but packs in a battery carrying over twice the capacity of the iPod shuffle's, a necessity for powering the iPod nano's screen.

The teardown also looks at the iPod nano's 1.54-inch, 240 x 240 pixel display, which offers a pixel density of a hefty 220 pixels per inch, not quite as high as the "Retina" display found in the iPhone 4 and fourth-generation iPod touch, but quite respectable. The report also notes that the "multi-touch" screen fails to deliver true multi-touch functionality in that it supports only two points of contact, with the only feature utilizing that class of touch event being the display rotation. Sources have indicated, however, that Apple also planned to offer pinch-to-zoom on the iPod nano, but the feature is not present in the shipping device.

- TUAW reports that while the iPod nano supports photo slideshows, an internal settings file also contains hints of potential video playback capabilities, with entries for TV captions, subtitles, and alternate audio.

- The aforementioned photo slideshows can be pushed to a TV using Apple's cable kits for component or composite connections.

- The new iPod nano can record voice memos when used with Apple's earphones containing remote and mic capabilities, sold separately.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

19 months ago
220 px/inch on the nano???

I want one of each please :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
From a technical standpoint, it probably could do video playback. I'm guessing Apple elected not to due to the small screen. What's more, the screen is perfectly square, so even 4:3 content wouldn't use the whole space, let alone 16:9 or wider.

EDIT: To be clear, I'm not complaining. I think it's a wise decision.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago

220 px/inch on the nano???

I want one of each please :)


+1
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
wow, so if I want to remove the clip properly, I basically have to remove the whole thing to reach the three screws that hold it in the back :mad:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
I would like to know how good the clip is for running. Can it be trusted?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
record voice memos? note to self: kill mike.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Apple has found value in starting products with slim feature lists and gradual addition/activation as early bugs are worked out and customer habits are discerned. May not be ideal for us feature-hungry geeks, but smart for common customers who want "just works" and get pleasant surprises later.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
What's the point of the touch screen on this thing. Seriously.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Bring back the clickwheel. Touchscreens aren't the answer for everything, Steve-o.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Don't see how you would use a three finger gesture on there though.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]