Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple's App Store Review Guidelines Offer Remarkably Candid View of App Store Philosophy


Just a short time ago, Apple announced that it is making some changes to the App Store review process, and among the changes is publication of the company's App Store Review Guidelines, offering developers a more transparent look at how their app submissions are examined by Apple's team of reviewers.

Engadget has re-published the guidelines, in which Apple utilizes a remarkably direct and candid tone in the introduction in an attempt to connect with developers.

Okay, so while Apple's tone throughout the guidelines is extremely direct, the highlights definitely come from the introduction, where the company basically lays it down:

- "We have lots of kids downloading lots of apps, and parental controls don't work unless the parents set them up (many don't). So know that we're keeping an eye out for the kids."
- "We have over 250,000 apps in the App Store. We don't need any more Fart apps."
- "We have lots of serious developers who don't want their quality Apps to be surrounded by amateur hour."
- "If your app is rejected, we have a Review Board that you can appeal to. If you run to the press and trash us, it never helps."
- "This is a living document, and new apps presenting new questions may result in new rules at any time. Perhaps your app will trigger this."
- "If it sounds like we're control freaks, well, maybe it's because we're so committed to our users and making sure they have a quality experience with our products."

The meat of the document consists of a multi-page list of well over 100 brief, to-the-point guidelines broken down into sections that primarily provide developers with concrete reasons why their apps might be rejected, but also offer a few tips about specific situations to define what may be permitted.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

19 months ago
This is fantastic, I absolutely agree with their rules on duplicate Apps. Parental controls, not so much, but how many flashlights do we really need? (Only one, thanks to HandyLight)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
good news.

hopefully this will allow us to get rid of the "stand in, wannabe" MR.app(s). :mad:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
sounds like a fair deal to me
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
You can never have too many fart apps.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Apple is playing pseudo parent again.... awesome.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
I love how they put voice to the guidelines. :p Usually it's a bunch of boring PR crap that no one reads.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
It is good that they posted this, but I find their intro comment about Parental Controls to be maddening. "Hey we have Parental Controls, but no one uses them, so we have to neuter everything in case a kid might download something naughty!!" THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!

Give me a break. Everyone suffers because negligent parents don't use the control tools provided.

It's Apple's decision to be like this, and we can take it or leave it -- I just think it's a crappy decision.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
Good news that they are being more transparent. This should help people understand the rules as they are.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
What do you mean no need for more fart apps?!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
19 months ago
I'm glad to see this. Considering a lot of Developers have temper tantrums once they receive that denial letter and don't even potentially work on fixing the problem.

I agree Apple can be control freaks, (look at the patent that was posted here for remotely shutting down jail-broken devices) but there is a line in which quality should beat out quantity and security for protecting customers and their data should beat out any joe-schmo application that doesn't fit within certain standards.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]