Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple's New Rechargeable AA Batteries Actually Sanyo Eneloops?


Several tipsters previously pointed us to the similarities in the published promotional specs of Apple's new rechargeable AA batteries and Sanyo's Eneloop batteries, suggesting that Apple have essentially rebranded Sanyo's offerings for sale it its own packaging. New testing by SuperApple.cz [Google translation] published today seems to confirm the suspicion, despite the lack of any definitive physical markings inside the batteries to give away the link.

In all likelihood, this indeed is the Sanyo Eneloop cells, specifically the model of HR-3UTG because they correspond to physical parameters of the articles (new articles Eneloop tests show essentially the same value) but also measured the capacity - if you view the document producer , you'll find it is these cells are indicated by the minimum capacity of 1900 mAh, then the regular 2000 mAh and Apple in this case decided to set the guaranteed capacity, although it is less beneficial according to the manufacturer, and according to our measurements.

The discovery that has rebranded another companies batteries is not necessarily a surprise, as it was unlikely that Apple took on the task of reinventing rechargeable battery technology on its own. The disclosure does reveal, however, that the Apple's batteries are not based on a brand-new battery technology, as Sanyo first developed its Eneloop batteries in 2005 and launched them for sale in 2006.


But the other component of Apple's battery package, the charger, does appear to be an Apple-designed product, with SuperApple.cz finding no tell-tale branding on its internal components while obviously offering Apple's traditional styling. The charger is designed to automatically reduce power usage to 30 milliwatts once it senses that batteries have been fully charged, the lowest "vampire draw" in the industry and 10 times lower than the industry average.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

20 months ago
Ofc they are...

Just like Cinema Displays are LGs...

:)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
What !, Apple don't manufacture batteries.....shocked.:D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Should I save money and buy Sanyos then? lol.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Why the title of the story focuses on the (negative) aspect of rebranded batteries vs. Apple's new charger design? Does MacRumors have a beef with Apple? :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
If you think that's something, wait until you hear what's in your Big Mac :eek:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Must be a really slow day in the news-room.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago

Should I save money and buy Sanyos then? lol.


You should have done that before this story.

The only thing that makes the Apple batteries and charger worth more than a regular charger and batteries is the inclusion of the Jobs' Reality Distortion Field in every packet.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Shocking being as apple has never used things made by another company. Thats why apple doesn't contract LG for displays and even goes as far as to mine its own aluminum. Nor has apple ever acquired another company in order to build off its products. Apple has always dedicated plenty of resources to reinventing the wheel regardless of the plethora of wheels available that could be bought out for less than the actual cost of reinventing the wheel.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Eneloops are great for wireless mice with their extremely low self discharge rate, they're what I use in mine. That's probably why Apple sells you 6 - there's always a fully charged pair waiting for you even if you charged them weeks ago. I figured they must be Eneloops from the announcement, it's a good thing IMO
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago

You should have done that before this story.

The only thing that makes the Apple batteries and charger worth more than a regular charger and batteries is the inclusion of the Jobs' Reality Distortion Field in every packet.


Or that they draw 10x less energy than the industry standard. But that's inconsistent with us raging against the negative publicity and crying out how Stevie over-priced them but we bought them anyway, so we'll just ignore innovation to soothe our egos.

I'm sure I'll get fanboy'd, but those are just the facts. This product is better than most on the market.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]