Got a tip for us? Share it...

Pink Floyd Wins Legal Battle Over Digital Sale of Individual Songs

BBC News reports that Pink Floyd has won a legal battle with its record label EMI over whether the label should be allowed to distribute digital versions of the band's material on a track-by-track basis as it does through Apple's iTunes Store. Pink Floyd is one of a number of high-profile bands that have objected to the splitting up of what it considers to be single pieces of work.

The rock legends, signed to EMI since 1967, said their contract meant their albums could not be split up without their permission.

A judge agreed, saying the contract contained a clause to "preserve the artistic integrity of the albums".

EMI has been ordered to pay 40,000 ($60,000) in costs, with a further fine to be decided.

Pink Floyd's current contract with EMI was signed prior to the advent of digital download music stores, and the band's lawyers argued that it made little sense that the contract's restrictions against the splitting up of "seamless" material would apply to physical distribution while digital distribution would be treated as a "free-for-all". For its part, EMI argued that use of the word "record" in the contract suggested that the agreement covered only physical media.

Pink Floyd's content remains available on an individual track basis in the iTunes Store, and it is unclear if there will be changes to that arrangement in the near future.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

25 months ago
See, I only listen to albums, and with Pink Floyd, they really put an emphasis into their albums, so I'm glad they went for this.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
Why would you not buy Pink Flyod's whole albums?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
I guess this means that we will see a few album only purchases appearing on the iTunes store.

I can understand that artists want their work to be heard in context but a lot of us sometimes only want to buy an odd track that they like rather than listen to the full 'artistic expression'.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
I side with Pink Floyd on this. I love their work and I want to listen to them from start to finish. I think they should go after radio stations that play just one of their songs instead of the whole album.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
I've always tended to buy albums as a whole, as it's important to get a feel for what the artist was trying to do/create. That said I'd never buy a Pink Floyd album because I'm not my Dad and I don't like prog rock.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
Then why don't Pink Floyd release their album on iTunes as one big track?

Problem solved.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago
Albums are outdated (as are Pink Floyd) - this is the muscle spasm of a dying band and a dying industry.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago

Then why don't Pink Floyd release their album on iTunes as one BIG track?

Problem solved.


Why not 2 huge tracks, then it could be one of the few iTunes LPs?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago

I think they should go after radio stations that play just one of their songs instead of the whole album.


I don't, actually. While I'm all for "artistic integrity", it's a fact that Pink Floyd has taken full advantage of radio over the last 40 years, because playing their singles on the radio results in album sales. So they were all for promoting and playing singles on the radio, but not for doing the same thing online...?

It feels slightly precious. But yay for them, I guess.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
25 months ago

I can understand that artists want their work to be heard in context but a lot of us sometimes only want to buy an odd track that they like rather than listen to the full 'artistic expression'.


Heh, and "in context" in the case of most "albums" means "the dozen miscellaneous songs (three good, nine bad) we thought might sell best when packaged together." ;)

I think they should go after radio stations that play just one of their songs instead of the whole album.


Indeed. Funny how "artistic expression" is only important when it doesn't negatively impact the artist's bottom line.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]