Fujitsu Possibly Gearing Up For Fight Over 'iPad' Trademark in U.S.
Last week, we uncovered evidence of Apple seeking to trademark the "iPad" name in a number of countries, foreshadowing the name of Apple's tablet device announced yesterday. At the time, we noted that Apple had not applied for an "iPad" trademark in the U.S., ostensibly due to Fujitsu already holding a claim to the name there. Further investigation soon revealed, however, that Apple has filed multiple requests to extend the allowable time period for it to oppose Fujitsu's still-pending trademark application. In addition, an Apple shell company finally did apply for the "iPad" trademark in the U.S.
The New York Times reports, however, that Fujitsu does not appear to be going down without a fight, seeking to protect the name of its iPad device for retail inventory management.
Apple's choice of the "iPhone" name similarly stepped on others' toes with its announcement in January 2007, and Cisco quickly sued Apple upon Apple's iPhone introduction after negotiations regarding the iPhone trademark owned by Cisco and used for its line of Web-enabled telephones had not resulted in an agreement to that point. The dispute was quickly resolved, with both companies allowed to use the iPhone name.
The New York Times reports, however, that Fujitsu does not appear to be going down without a fight, seeking to protect the name of its iPad device for retail inventory management.
"It's our understanding that the name is ours," Masahiro Yamane, director of Fujitsu's public relations division, said Thursday. He said Fujitsu was aware of Apple's plans to sell the iPad tablet and that the company was consulting lawyers over next steps.
The report notes that Fujitsu's iPad bears a number of similarities to Apple's iPad, including a color touchscreen, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, as well as support for VoIP calling. Apple currently has until February 28th to file its opposition to Fujitsu's "iPad" trademark application, although it could request a further extension with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Apple's choice of the "iPhone" name similarly stepped on others' toes with its announcement in January 2007, and Cisco quickly sued Apple upon Apple's iPhone introduction after negotiations regarding the iPhone trademark owned by Cisco and used for its line of Web-enabled telephones had not resulted in an agreement to that point. The dispute was quickly resolved, with both companies allowed to use the iPhone name.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)27 months ago
27 months ago
iPad is an awful name that even the mainstream press has noted people making fun of.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/27/AR2010012704268.html?hpid=moreheadlines
Let's not even talk about the number of times the same juvenile joke has appeared in Macrumors.
Maybe this will be the cover Apple needs to change the name before the product ships.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/27/AR2010012704268.html?hpid=moreheadlines
Let's not even talk about the number of times the same juvenile joke has appeared in Macrumors.
Maybe this will be the cover Apple needs to change the name before the product ships.
27 months ago
iPad is far too close to iPod. Different accents around the world will make them sound exactly the same. In fact, during the Keynote, Steve said iPod instead of iPad (or at least it sounded very close to iPod).
iSlate would have been far better.. I was half expecting iSlate to be the "one more thing".
My favourite is, "rev B is rumoured to include wings".
iSlate would have been far better.. I was half expecting iSlate to be the "one more thing".
iPad is an awful name that even the mainstream press has noted people making fun of. Let's not even talk about the number of times the same juvenile joke has appeared in Macrumors.
My favourite is, "rev B is rumoured to include wings".
27 months ago
"It's our understanding that the name is ours," Masahiro Yamane, director of Fujitsu's public relations division, said Thursday. He said Fujitsu was aware of Apple's plans to sell the iPad tablet and that the company was consulting lawyers over next steps."
Is it also their understanding that they abandoned the trademark only to resurrect it in June in anticipation of Apple possibly using it ?
Is it also their understanding that they abandoned the trademark only to resurrect it in June in anticipation of Apple possibly using it ?
27 months ago
I thought "iPod" was horrible when I first heard it.
Anyway, Fujitsu's gonna get spanked.
Anyway, Fujitsu's gonna get spanked.
[ Read All Comments ]



Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...