Got a tip for us? Share it...

Rumors of Disabled Intel Atom Support in Mac OS X 10.6.2 Unfounded?

Earlier this week, a report surfaced claiming that Apple had apparently disabled support for Intel's Atom processors in the latest developer build of Mac OS X 10.6.2. The revelation set off a firestorm around the Internet, riling many users who have modified their Atom-based netbook models to run OS X and sparking speculation that Apple may have been moving to hamper such "Hackintosh" netbook projects as it prepares to launch its much-rumored tablet computer.

In an update to his original blog post about the discovery, Tumblr user "stellarola" reveals that the latest Mac OS X 10.6.2 developer seed (Build 10C535) is apparently working just fine on his Atom-based netbook hardware.

Anyways, in the latest development build Atom appears to have resurrected itself zombie style in 10C535. The Atom lives another day, but nothing is concrete until the final version of 10.6.2 is out.

The original post describing the lack of Atom support was made on October 27th, one day before Apple seeded Build 10C535 to developers, meaning that the poster was experiencing difficulties on his Atom-based netbook with the then-current Build 10C531. It is unclear at this time whether the lack of Atom support in that build was intentional on Apple's part or if it was simply a bug that the company addressed in the next developer version.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

30 months ago
Fingers crossed, then, that the atom-break was simply an accidental biproduct of some sort of bug.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
There's a few members who have invested a lot of time and energy on that other thread who are going to be disappointed about this. :D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
That's why it's called MacRumors
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
Even if "support" was disabled for the Atom processor, it is against the EULA for Mac OS X to be installed on non Mac hardware, so people shouldn't be shocked.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
Well, for me anyway, fingers crossed things stay this way.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
PLEASE DELIVER 10.6.2 NOW !!!
I don't want to believe that they are still spending any time around atom, while we need the update NOW ! I want to use safari again !
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago

PLEASE DELIVER 10.6.2 NOW !!!
I don't want to believe that they are still spending any time around atom, while we need the update NOW !


Exactly my thoughts. I mean who cares about the damn Atom anyway...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
What? An unfounded rumor based on one person's experience riling thousands of people that would otherwise be completely unaffected?

Say it isn't so. Not reported here on MacRumors! :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
Its funny how the hackintosh community and tech news sites had a **** fest over something in a developer build, where bugs are worked out. I also really hope tech journalism hasn't stooped to basing claims off one user's feedback on a forum...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago

PLEASE DELIVER 10.6.2 NOW !!!
I don't want to believe that they are still spending any time around atom, while we need the update NOW ! I want to use safari again !


lol i know safari is well good... just flash makes it wank... and i dont like firefox :( :mad:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]