Snow Leopard Reviews Begin Rolling Out
One of the most interesting tidbits comes from Walt Mossberg of The Wall Street Journal, who reports that the $29 Snow Leopard upgrade advertised by Apple as being only for current Leopard users will in fact install on systems currently running Tiger. Apple's official policy is that Tiger users are required to purchase the Mac Box Set, which includes iLife '09 and iWork '09 in addition to Snow Leopard, for $169.
And, for owners of Intel-based Macs who are still using the older Tiger version of the Mac OS, Apple is officially making Snow Leopard available only in a "boxed set" that includes other software and costs $169. The reasoning is that these folks never paid the $129 back in 2007 to upgrade to Leopard. But here's a tip: Apple concedes that the $29 Snow Leopard upgrade will work properly on these Tiger-equipped Macs, so you can save the extra $140.
Overall, Mossberg found some nice new features in Snow Leopard, including Apple's new auto-correct for text, location-based automatic time zone updating, and "video screenshots" for recording on-screen actions. He also found, however, a number of bugs and glitches. Primarily related to third-party software and drivers, those bugs resulted in some frustration, leading Mossberg to provide Snow Leopard with only a lukewarm endorsement.Apple already had the best computer operating system in Leopard, and Snow Leopard makes it a little better. But it isn't a big breakthrough for average users, and, even at $29, it isn't a typical Apple lust-provoking product.
Other reviews from around the Internet include:David Pogue, The New York Times:
Let's hope that Apple hurries up with its inevitable 10.6.0.1 update, too, to address the occasional Safari crash and cosmetic glitch I experienced, too.
Otherwise, if you're already running Leopard, paying the $30 for Snow Leopard is a no-brainer. You'll feel the leap forward in speed polish, and you'll keep experiencing those "oh, that's nice" moments for weeks to come.
Impressive and important, it's an update that will revitalize your existing Mac even though you'll be stumped for a quick five-minute demo that convinces the people around you that much of anything has changed at all.
Jason Snell, Macworld:Granted, it's a collection of feature tweaks and upgrades, as well as under-the-hood modifications that might not pay off for users immediately. But the price of upgrading is so low that I've really got to recommend it for all but the most casual, low-impact Mac users.
Jason Parker, CNET:Overall, we think that Snow Leopard did almost everything Apple says it set out to do: it refined and enhanced Leopard to make it easier to use. Though the system performs well in everyday use, many of our tests indicate it is slightly slower than the older version of Leopard in more intensive application processes. Still, we highly recommend upgrading for all the new features and Microsoft Exchange support.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)He tested 3 Macs of various vintage but doesn't really discuss how SL treats them differently. The review is superficial in that he only discusses the superficial and "daily use" aspects, but that is to be expected since he is mostly a consumer oriented reviewer.
He final verdict is that SL is a solid update, but not a "must have," and most consumers (probably not talking to MR readers) won't notice any differences (which is true, especially if they have a machine that is 3+ years old).
Mossberg's SL review is up: http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090826/apple-changes-leopards-spots/
He tested 3 Macs of various vintage but doesn't really discuss how SL treats them differently. The review is superficial in that he only discusses the superficial and "daily use" aspects, but that is to be expected since he is mostly a consumer oriented reviewer.
He final verdict is that SL is a solid update, but not a "must have," and most consumers (probably not talking to MR readers) won't notice any differences (which is true, especially if they have a machine that is 3+ years old).
If they have a machine that's 3+ years old, they can't install Snow Leopard, so of course it won't make any difference. For most people though, it will make some difference now, and a much bigger difference once apps begin to be adapted to the new technologies in SL. It'll be a slow process of gaining features/speed, not an all at once change. Still worth it in my opinion.
jW
If they have a machine that's 3+ years old, they can't install Snow Leopard, so of course it won't make any difference.
My Core Duo MacBook Pro is 3+ years old and will be getting Snow Leopard installed tomorrow.
Sounds solid so far, can't wait to have a go myself. I think this is exactly what OS's have been missing for a few years now. They kept getting bigger and more bloated. I applaud Apple for having the guts to reign in the superfluous features and make one thats more efficient.
Totally agree with you there... I'm sure if other OS manufacturers took a leaf out of this project the global computer stress levels would fall dramatically...
[ Read All Comments ]

Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...