Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple's North Carolina Data Center to Focus on Cloud Computing?

Cult of Mac posts an interview with Rich Miller, editor of Data Center Knowledge, regarding possible plans for Apple's $1 billion data center due to open in rural Maiden, North Carolina in 2010. At approximately 500,000 square feet and roughly five times the size of the company's existing center in Newark, California, Apple's new data center will be among the largest in the world, sparking questions about what the company plans to do with the capacity.

While public figures closest to the Apple deal acknowledge only that the project will support existing iTunes and MobileMe services, speculation has arisen that Apple may be planning a significant foray into "cloud computing", allowing users to move applications and data to Internet-based locations accessible from any Web-enabled device.

One of the leading theories about the size of the NC project is that Apple is planning future cloud computing services that will require lots of data center storage. Cloud computing is a hot trend, and I'd be surprised if Apple isn't thinking hard - and thinking differently - about cloud computing. Many cloud enthusiasts say that cloud computing will eliminate the need for data centers. In reality, the only thing will change is the owner of the building. All the applications and data that are moving into the cloud will live on servers in brick-and-mortar data centers. The companies that are building the biggest data centers tend to also have the biggest cloud ambitions.

Apple until now has used content delivery networks (CDNs) such as Akamai and Limelight Networks to serve significant amounts of content to users, and some have speculated that the new data center will allow Apple to achieve cost savings by bringing a significant part of that third-party content delivery system in-house. Miller, however, points to Apple's data center's rural location far from the network-dense areas where content delivery centers are typically located as a sign that Apple is pursuing cost and scale efficiency rather than the connectivity most dedicated delivery networks are looking for.

Facebook cited latency to Europe as a key factor in its decision to add data centers in Virginia. Before that, MySpace added a data center in Los Angeles to reduce its reliance on CDNs. But in both cases, those companies sought out Internet hubs where they could connect with dozens of other networks to manage their Internet traffic. You don't get that in rural North Carolina, so Apple seems more focused on cost and scale than on connectivity - which again would suggest a cloud focus.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

32 months ago
Hopefully this means better iTunes (maybe) and better Mobile Me. Everything will get faster:)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
yeah it does sound like cloud computing. but i bet it will be awhile before we as consumers will see anything become of this
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
This seems logical. All the big players must be seriously looking at Cloud Computing for the next few years.

It would be nice if they could use some of that capacity to make iTunes run a little faster though, it seems so slow some days.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
Is anyone else thinking Mac OS 11 could be mainly cloud based for Apple's applications, of course its early days but they are running out of numbers 10.6 ?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
For anyone that wants a great in depth read into the world of could computing I suggest picking up the current issue of MIT's Technology Review.

I know its the future (ironic since its a better version of past technology) but I'm not really looking forward to cloud computing unless we also have the option of running everything locally the way we do now.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
Who knows what wizardry Apple may have up its corporate sleeve? I, for one, would be happy with more storage space per user on Me.com.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
I don't want all my stuff to live on a cloud... I'm perfectly happy with local storage, even if it means I can't access it except from my home computer. This is one reason I have no interest in google's offerings beyond gmail (and the basic stuff like search, or maps).
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
More space, more streamlined access, more everything. If this is the case then I think they're on the right track but if this means I can't use local storage I do not care for the idea at all.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
An East Coast presence would address latency issues....and such big deals don't ever come without some other little 'things' here and there: don't be surprised to hear that North Carolina runs a couple of very big fat pipes along the I-40 corridor (if not further).

Figure at $16K/mile * 300 miles = $5M ... which is 0.5% of the total cost of the $1B data center.

Doesn't seem like a big deal to me, percentage-wise.


-hh
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
32 months ago
Apple does like to own all the pieces of the pie. Having customers running their hardware and software to access their services in their data center fits their modus operandi.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]