Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Estimated to Account for 20% of Cellphone Industry Profit

The Wall Street Journal reports (subscription required) on research from Deutsche Bank analyst Brian Modoff showing that Apple and Research in Motion together accounted for approximately 35% of the cellphone industry's total operating profit in 2008 while only representing 3% of total unit sales. Apple's share of industry profits clocked in at approximately 20% while holding only just over 1% of the unit market share.

The two companies' outsize share of profits underlines the shift in the wireless industry toward feature-rich devices accenting easy-to-use software and away from an emphasis on hardware. Smart phones account for only about 13% of total cellphone sales globally, but the segment is growing, despite a drop in the broader cellphone market. Apple and RIM had about 32% of the smart-phone market between them in the first quarter, estimates IDC.

Moreover, Modoff estimates that Apple and Research in Motion will reach a combined 5% of unit sales for 2009, raking in roughly 58% of the total industry profit between them.

The report notes that wireless carrier subsidies provide the driving force behind such large profits for leading smartphones such as Apple's iPhone and Research in Motion's BlackBerry lines. Apple reportedly receives about $400 in carrier subsidy for each iPhone, while BlackBerry sees about $200 and the typical basic cellphone about $100. Among manufacturers dominating the basic cellphone market, only market leader Nokia is able to leverage its economies of scale to pull in a greater share of industry profits (55%) than its corresponding unit market share (46%). But even Nokia has seen its unit market share and profits slip as customers increasingly adopt more sophisticated smartphone models from smaller competitors.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

34 months ago
Can someone say "App Store"
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago
Cool. :cool: Way to go Apple.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago
"QUOTE: The two companies' outsize share of profits underlines the shift in the wireless industry toward feature-rich devices accenting easy-to-use software and away from an emphasis on hardware. "


Can someone clarify the above statement for me? Don't "feature rich devices" necessitate "hardware" advances? The post seems to put the iPhone in the "feature rich devices" category. But it has advanced hardware including the accelerometer, touch-screen, GPS, etc., etc. How, exactly, is the distinction between these two categories made? Is it even a logical distinction? Maybe now there are three categories: simple phones; advanced hardware; and advanced hardware with software. But advanced hardware without software to exploit it makes no more sense than an advanced monitor connected to a computer lacking even a rudimentary graphics card.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago
That's crazy... Why can't Apple ask for less from AT&T as far as subsidies and more in terms of actual service.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago
For me no subscription is required... Is it because i live outside the U.S? Anyhow you ca easily circumvent this by searching the article on google and then click on the link. Subscription is not required for google referrals...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago

"QUOTE: The two companies' outsize share of profits underlines the shift in the wireless industry toward feature-rich devices accenting easy-to-use software and away from an emphasis on hardware. "


Can someone clarify the above statement for me?


The point is that Apple and RIM are causing the focus to shift to the interface rather than the hardware itself. Yes, they both use advanced hardware, but they don't advertise it. For example, they don't advertise the amount of RAM nor the chips being used. It's just storage size and, oh hey, look at all the cool software.

crackpip
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago
very interesting that consumers shift from basic phones to smartphones.

maybe that could mean that in the future consumers will shift from basic netbooks to more sophisticates mac tablets?;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago
Is this in reference to the data plan for AT&T or are they solely talking about the device costs?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago

very interesting that consumers shift from basic phones to smartphones.


Although I can never see smartphones replacing laptops, I still wonder about how much they are going to erode the future profitability of making laptops or netbooks. If smartphones features keep on improving at the present rate, will they become the next personal computer? Remember, the average customer only use their computers for internet surfing, minor word processing, iTunes, and Facebook. This is evident in the popularity of netbooks.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
34 months ago
Its quite a big chunk, but it will go up a lot more I reckon.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]