Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Briefly Approved 'Baby Shaker' App, Issues Apology

A 99-cent application by the name of 'Baby Shaker' appeared briefly in the App Store yesterday, but was quickly removed by Apple after an uproar from users who found it to be inappropriate and offensive. The simple application displayed a crying baby on the screen with the instruction being that users should listen to the crying for as long as possible before shaking the iPhone to make the baby stop.

The Associated Press reports that Apple issued a statement apologizing for approving the application and stating that its approval had been an error.

Apple spokeswoman Natalie Kerris said Thursday that the game was "deeply offensive" and said it should not have been approved for sale. "We sincerely apologize for this mistake," Kerris said in a statement.

The incident has put Apple's approval process in the spotlight again. Though in the past, Apple has been criticized for being too restrictive with publishable content in the App Store. They have previously rejected a number of apps from the App Store for a variety of reasons. SF Gate suggests that the incident may even make Apple become more conservative about App approvals in the future.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

37 months ago
Wow, how did this App even get approved in the first place?!?

Read Article Here

Apple Inc. pulled a 99-cent iPhone game called "Baby Shaker" from its iTunes store Wednesday after its premise — quiet a crying baby with a vigorous shake — prompted outrage.

According to screen shots posted on several Web sites, "Baby Shaker" displayed black-and-white line drawings of a baby. The iTunes description included the line, "See how long you can endure his or her adorable cries before you just have to find a way to quiet the baby down!" Once the iPhone owner finishes shaking the device, the on-screen baby is depicted with large red X's over its eyes.

Public outcry ensued, with organizations including the National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome and the Sarah Jane Brain Foundation condemning Apple for approving the game's sale.

The application was designed by Sikalosoft, which also makes a 99-cent "Dice Mosaic" iPhone program that converts digital photos into black and white mosaics made from dice.

Sikalosoft did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment, but "Baby Shaker" was deleted from its Web site Wednesday afternoon.

Apple spokeswoman Natalie Kerris said "Baby Shaker" went on sale Monday, and confirmed that Apple removed it Wednesday. She would not comment when asked why the program was initially approved for sale. Apple itself screens each iPhone application, a process some prospective iPhone application developers have complained can take weeks or months. Others have said Apple gives little feedback when it accepts or rejects a program.

The Cupertino, Calif.-based company has rejected apps that let iPhone users throw virtual shoes at President George W. Bush or watch clips from the "South Park" cartoon. It has accepted numerous programs that simulate flatulence.

Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
Couldn't tell you but Apple's rejected our geotagging app 3 times in a row now. http://blog.return7.com/a-bit-ridiculousplacetagger-rejected-for-3rd-time :mad: It just goes to show you that the review system is messed up. They should just remove it entirely and put a "mark as offensive" button up..

Edit: it is what it is. :\
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
I have no idea why Apple rejects return7's application over and over, but as a beta tester of it, I do know that it is something lots of users will find really useful. With all the useless garbage in the App Store, Apple should be pushing this one to the top of the stack as something actually valuable. Get on with it!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago

Wow, how did this App even get approved in the first place?!?


Excellent question. There is no way in hell this app should have even been made, much less approved by Apple.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago

Excellent question. There is no way in hell this app should have even been made, much less approved by Apple.


I dunno, maybe I'm crazy but if someone wants to make something they should, then the market will determine if they should have or not. It sucks that Apple pulled it. Part of that whole being free to make our own decisions thing.

What's worse? The don't shake a baby app or the fact that dontshakeababy.com exists because people actually have to be told not to shake a baby. I personally don't need dontstickanoliveforkinyoureye.com to know not to do it, it's kinda sad actually.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
How can an APP like this even get approved. I love my iPhone, but Apple
needs to revamp their approval/screening process...this APP has out done
all the Fart APPs.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago

I dunno, maybe I'm crazy but if someone wants to make something they should, then the market will determine if they should have or not. It sucks that Apple pulled it. Part of that whole being free to make our own decisions thing.


That's exactly what happened. The market did determine it, as Apple is a for profit company, not a governmental body. Your having free speech doesn't mean that a newspaper is obligated to publish you.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
I wonder how many people Apple has assigned to doing reviews? I have this impression that there's one employee sitting in a cubicle with an overflow of work to do, making arbitrary and bad choices because there's no time to do a better job. Or maybe the whole process is automated and relies on A.I.!

It's not to anyone's benefit for Apple to make these approval and disapproval misjudgments, nor to delay apps getting to market, so I hope they take care of whatever the problem is.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
Maybe sling should call their app, sling the babies, it may just get approved.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
37 months ago
They have a monkey at a desk with Yes/No buttons
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]