Got a tip for us? Share it...

Intel Officially Brands Nehalem as 'Core i7' Processor

Intel has announced that the upcoming Nehalem processor will be officially known as the Core i7.

Nehalem has been the code name for Intel's upcoming processors first due in Q4 2008. Nehalem represents a major overhaul of Intel's processor technology and introduces a number of improvements over existing process bottlenecks.

Intel's choice of name seems to be arbitrary but will reportedly fit into the naming scheme for the full line of chips, as explained by TGDaily.com:

Intel told us that i7 was simply chosen because it is short and sweet. The company showed some understanding for our confusion over this name choice and promised that i7 would make sense down the road when additional new identifiers are introduced.

Intel is expected to reveal more information about the Core i7 at the Intel Developer Forum on August 19th. At the conference, Intel will also detail a new energy saving technique in the i7:

Intel would not reveal the nature of the new energy efficiency feature in the Core i7 chips. A company spokesman said it is not a direct evolution of the Intel's SpeedStep technology that automates frequency scaling based on workloads.

While the first of the Core i7 processors will be introduced in Q4 2008, mainstream desktop and mobile versions of the processor will be delayed until well into 2009.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

46 months ago
Monday already? :rolleyes:

Bloomfield at a low end, stable price of $266 is really going to kill what Apple offers.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
Sounds good. At least there won't be anyone asking to wait for this one :rolleyes: although I imagine they'll be introduced into the MacBook line by the end of '09
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
2009!? No new macbook pro models in September?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
Well, sure looks like Intel is catching some of the 'i-something' fever from Apple. :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
hm, that means Penryn Macbook or Macbook pro as soon as they are released. I plan on buying a 13.3 inch notebook so it could be a MB or a MBP.

then a second notebook end of 2009 or beginning of 2010. maybe even quadcore in 2010.

i wonder how much energy saving beyond reducing the clockspeed is possible. i hope the chips don't run very hot.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

2009!? No new macbook pro models in September?


there will still be a MB/MBP update in September since i7 mobile won't arrive until 2nd half next year.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

2009!? No new macbook pro models in September?

A Nehalem mobile platform won't even be out until 2009.

You're looking forward to improved Penryn 45nm processors on the just released Montevina platform.

hm, that means Penryn Macbook or Macbook pro as soon as they are released. I plan on buying a 13.3 inch notebook so it could be a MB or a MBP.

then a second notebook end of 2009 or beginning of 2010. maybe even quadcore in 2010.

i wonder how much energy saving beyond reducing the clockspeed is possible. i hope the chips don't run very hot.

I expect a quad in the 17" MacBook Pro this year. It'll be some time for one to show up in the MacBook.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

Well, sure looks like Intel is catching some of the 'i-something' fever from Apple. :)


Or you're just recognizing that and Apple has taken over your mind!

A Nehalem mobile platform won't even be out until 2009.

You're looking forward to improved Penryn 45nm processors on the just released Montevina platform.


I hope Apple doesn't pull a Mac Mini on the rest of the line.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

I hope Apple doesn't pull a Mac Mini on the rest of the line.

Apple has been doing a Fall laptop update for how long now?

Mac mini needs love but we have plenty of other threads on that. I really want to buy on right now as well...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
anything faster and with less power consumption will be a welcome addition
thumbs up
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]