Got a tip for us? Share it...

Intel Announces 45-nm Penryn Processors

Intel released 16 of their new Penryn Core 2 Extreme and Xeon processors today. The new chips incorporate the new "Hi-k" metal gate formula and also incorporate a smaller 45-nanometer manufacturing process. These changes deliver faster and more energy-efficient processors.

While they did introduce a Core 2 Extreme Qx9750 quad-core processor with SSE4, our attention has focused on Intel's new Xeon processors, which makes up the bulk of Intel's announcements today.

New to the Intel line-up of server processors are 15 server dual-core and quad-core 45nm Hi-k Intel Xeon processors. The 12 new quad-core chips boast clock speeds ranging from 2GHz up to 3.20GHz, with front side bus speeds (FSB) up to 1600MHz, and cache sizes of 12MB. The three new dual-core chips feature clock speeds of up to 3.40GHz, an FSB of up to 1600MHz, and cache sizes of 6MB.


The new 5400 Xeon chips are compatible with existing Xeon platforms and sets a number of benchmark world records, according to Intel. More data is available at Intel's site.

Apple has been rumored to be buying up the high end 3.2GHz Penryn Xeon processors which feature a faster 1600MHz bus and 12MB of L2 cache for an upcoming Mac Pro revision. Apple currently uses the 5100 Xeon Woodcrest (Quad core Macs) or 5300 Xeon Clovertown (8-core Macs) processors.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

56 months ago
So would these chipsets fit into the sockets of the current Mac Pro's for upgradeability (although voiding warranty)?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
This week has GOT to be the week for the Mac Pro update to drop.

If it doesn't, then it is a true reflection of how Apple could care less about its professional customers. The Mac Pro update is well past the point of overdue.

I wonder if they are going to price BTO options according to the market, and not into the stratosphere like they usually do.


Stratosphere
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
They very well might, depending on how "compatible with previous Xeons" is defined. However, you would NOT get the benefit of the faster bus speed by just slotting in a new CPU into your Mac Pro.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
so will apple's announcement of new/updated mac pro's be tomorrow (tuesday) or MWSF?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
What are you waiting for Apple? LETS GO!!!!!!!! :mad::confused:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
Any day now for updated MP's!!! I'm thinking tomorrow (11/12)! :D:D:D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
Now we can only hope to see 45nm chips in the new iMacs on the next revision.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
to all the poor souls who have been waiting in line to get the next Mac Pro and have been waiting for so long, dawn is breaking...

hopefully this means new Mac Pros + Displays in January... and an update to the iMac would be nice then too (that's the long line i'm in currently) :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

This week has GOT to be the week for the Mac Pro update to drop.

If it doesn't, then it is a true reflection of how Apple could care less about its professional customers. The Mac Pro update is well past the point of overdue.

I wonder if they are going to price BTO options according to the market, and not into the stratosphere like they usually do.


Stratosphere


You make it sound like the Mac Pro's are currently too underpowered to even run Photoshop. Is there something seriously wrong with the current 8 core config besides it not be Penryn?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
For those of you wondering why Apple hasn't updated the Mac Pro yet, I firmly believe that they were waiting for an announcement like this one from Intel. They probably knew that the GPUs in the current Mac Pro line were long in the tooth, and I firmly believe that they will do something about it in the next Mac Pro revision - coming sooner than we expect. Probably at 9:00 AM Pacific Time, 11/12/2007.;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]