Got a tip for us? Share it...

Leopard's Firewall Criticized

A security research firm is criticizing Leopard's security, namely the new system's firewall.

Heise Security was highly critical of the firewall and declared that it failed every test. The tests centered around Apple's default configuration and whether the firewall configured correctly due to user input.

[Leopard's firewall] is not activated by default and, even when activated, it does not behave as expected. Network connections to non-authorised services can still be established and even under the most restrictive setting, "Block all incoming connections," it allows access to system services from the internet.


The company does acknowledge that the system services that it communicated with in its tests did not seem immediately exploitable (though one, ntpd was out of date). However, the company does advise that the issues be addressed by Apple and users beware of the shortcomings.

Apple has been touting Leopard's security as one of the many features of Leopard.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

56 months ago
You wouldn't even believe Microsoft to be so stupid to expose open services (and even NetBIOS!!) to the internet when the firewall is setup to block ALL traffic. No kidding, Leopard does. Though, there is no proof of concept exploit, yet, that's a totally unneccessary design flaw, even a freshman CS student wouldn't be allowed to turn in.

From the article (German heise magazine):


The Mac OS X Leopard firewall failed every test. It is not activated by default and, even when activated, it does not behave as expected. Network connections to non-authorised services can still be established and even under the most restrictive setting, "Block all incoming connections," it allows access to system services from the internet. Although the problems and peculiarities described here are not security vulnerabilities in the sense that they can be exploited to break into a Mac, Apple would be well advised to sort them out pronto.

Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

You wouldn't even believe Microsoft to be so stupid to expose open services (and even NetBIOS!!) to the internet when the firewall is setup to block ALL traffic. No kidding, Leopard does. Though, there is no proof of concept exploit, yet, that's a totally unneccessary design flaw, even a freshman CS student wouldn't be allowed to turn in.

From the article (German heise magazine):


It's no surprise. I loved the old firewall, this firewall is awful. It doesn't work right. Little Snitch is better than it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

You wouldn't even believe Microsoft to be so stupid to expose open services (and even NetBIOS!!) to the internet when the firewall is setup to block ALL traffic. No kidding, Leopard does. Though, there is no proof of concept exploit, yet, that's a totally unneccessary design flaw, even a freshman CS student wouldn't be allowed to turn in.

From the article (German heise magazine):


Thank God for hardware firewalls.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

Thank God for hardware firewalls.


I wonder what degree of hardware firewall you would need to compensate.

Would a standard router with NAT work?

Or, would you actually need a router with a specific firewall to compensate?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

I wonder what degree of hardware firewall you would need to compensate.

Would a standard router with NAT work?

Or, would you actually need a router with a specific firewall to compensate?


I have an AEBS. It has a hardware firewall and it sucks. Apple can't even do hardware firewalls right. :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

I have an AEBS. It has a hardware firewall and it sucks. Apple can't even do hardware firewalls right. :rolleyes:


I have a Linksys Router with a Hardware Firewall in it. I wonder if that is adequate, or if the Leopard issue would create an open door.

It's a BEFSX41 Labeled as a Broadband Firewall Router.

I've previously configured it, and it seems to have passed the online scanners. So, hopefully it will close the door that Apple is opening.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

I have a Linksys Router with a Hardware Firewall in it. I wonder if that is adequate, or if the Leopard issue would create an open door.

It's a BEFSX41 Labeled as a Broadband Firewall Router.

I've previously configured it, and it seems to have passed the online scanners. So, hopefully it will close the door that Apple is opening.


That should be more than adequate.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

That should be more than adequate.


I sure hope so :confused:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago
Anybody turn on the advanced settings, use stealth, then look at the logs awhile latter. :(

Edit: I miss the dead SPI enabled router.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
56 months ago

Anybody turn on the advanced settings, use stealth, then look at the logs awhile latter. :(

Edit: I miss the dead SPI enabled router.


From reading the article, I couldn't tell.

SPI, I seem to recall something about that when I was researching my router / firewall purchase. Seems it was a feature of the Linksys Router if I remember correctly. But, then I could just be mixing things up at the moment.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]