Notice to Developers: You Could Be Entitled to Between a $250 and $30,000 Payment From Apple - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Notice to Developers: You Could Be Entitled to Between a $250 and $30,000 Payment From Apple

Apple on Thursday evening announced it has reached a $100 million settlement that, pending court approval, will resolve a class action lawsuit from U.S. developers who alleged that Apple has a monopoly on the distribution of iOS apps and in-app purchases.

app store gold banner
As part of the settlement, some U.S. developers would be entitled to receive a payment from Apple, so long as they meet certain requirements.

Who is eligible for a payment from Apple?

According to law firm Hagens Berman, which brought the lawsuit against Apple in 2019, the class includes any current or former U.S. developer of an iOS app that earned less than $1 million through the U.S. App Store in paid downloads and/or in-app purchases/subscriptions per calendar year between June 4, 2015 and April 26, 2021.

How can I submit a claim for a payment from Apple?

Eligible developers will be able to submit a claim through the website SmallAppDeveloperAssistance.com once the settlement has received court approval.

When can I submit a claim for a payment from Apple?

Developers can sign up on SmallAppDeveloperAssistance.com to be notified when the site launches. No specific timeframe has been provided, but in a court filing, law firm Hagens Berman proposed that the claims period begin within 45 days after court approval. Developers would then have a proposed 120 days to submit a claim.

How much will my payment be from Apple?

Eligible developers will be able to receive a payment between $250 and $30,000 from Apple depending on their total App Store earnings between June 4, 2015 and April 26, 2021, as outlined in the chart below from the settlement filing.

apple developer settlement chart
According to law firm Hagens Berman, a 100% claims rate is not likely, meaning that not all eligible developers will file for a payment from Apple. In that event, the law firm said the minimum payment amounts will increase proportionally, meaning that eligible developers may ultimately receive a larger payment from Apple.

Any leftover funds after payments to developers who submitted a claim would be sent to Girls Who Code, a non-profit organization that works to close the gender gap in computer science and programming, according to the settlement filing.

Why did Apple agree to this settlement?

According to the settlement filing, class members who do not opt out "expressly agree to the appropriateness of Apple's commission structure" for the App Store, including the Small Business Program. Class members also release their claims against Apple, including any claim that they were "overcharged" by virtue of Apple's commission on paid app downloads and/or in-app purchases/subscriptions through the App Store.

Can I opt out of the settlement?

Yes. Developers who opt out of the class action lawsuit will not be eligible for a payment from Apple but will retain their individual rights to sue Apple for the claims alleged in the complaint. Details on the opt-out process will likely be shared on the settlement website once it is live, or developers can contact law firm Hagens Berman.

Where can I get more details about the lawsuit?

The class action lawsuit, Cameron et al v. Apple Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in June 2019. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers presided over the case. The original complaint is available on CourtListener and more details are available on law firm Hagens Berman's website.

Popular Stories

Apple Card iPhone 16 Pro Feature

Apple Card Promo to Offer Free AirPods Pro 3

Friday May 15, 2026 8:59 am PDT by
Starting as early as next week, customers who sign up for an Apple Card at Apple's retail stores in the U.S. will receive $249 cash back when they purchase AirPods Pro 3, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. The promotion has yet to be officially announced by Apple, so exact terms and conditions are not available at this time. AirPods Pro 3 are priced at $249 in the U.S., so customers who...
Apple WWDC25 iOS 26 CarPlay Light mode 250609

Six Popular iPhone Apps Now Available on CarPlay

Thursday May 14, 2026 9:10 am PDT by
Apple's CarPlay system for accessing iPhone apps on a vehicle's dashboard screen has received six popular apps in recent weeks: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok, Google Meet, WhatsApp, and the indie artist streaming platform Audiomack. Make sure you have the latest version of each app and they will automatically appear on CarPlay. ChatGPT Starting with iOS 26.4, CarPlay supports voice-based...
ipad mini 7 blue

OLED iPad Mini: Release Date, Pricing, and What to Expect

Thursday May 14, 2026 5:08 am PDT by
According to the latest rumors, Apple is close to launching its next-generation iPad mini. So what should we expect from the successor to the iPad mini 7 that Apple released over a year ago? Read on to find out. Processor and Performance Apple is working on a next-generation version of the iPad mini (codename J510/J511) that features the A19 Pro chip, according to information found in code...

Top Rated Comments

62 months ago
Developers really sold themselves off short with only a 100 million dollar payout.

I mean come on, the highest earning tier at $1,000,000 a payout of $30,000 (3%).
The payouts are only really benefiting that 1 cent to 100 dollar tier.
If this new steering rule squashes the 30% Apple Tax fight, Apple will be laughing their way to the bank

Meanwhile Tim Cook gets a 750 million stock payout
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DesertDrummer Avatar
62 months ago

Apple's extortion racket is starting to crack. You can't shake down developers for 30% anymore by ARM twisting them into only selling through the Apple store.
An extortion racket that you have to willingly choose, sign up for, read an agreement about, and pay an annual subscription fee to participate in. Yeah, real mafia s**t here.

I'm an actual app developer. Are you? If you're not, maybe don't speak for us.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
carlsson Avatar
62 months ago
I still don't understand this.
1. I provide a platform that you can rent for 30% of your earnings on this platform.
2. It's optional.
3. You sue me because I'm too expensive?

🤔
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ruka.snow Avatar
62 months ago

Yes, because you had no choice and no alternative. Apple's won't allow anyone else to host an App Store on "their" phone (that you think you own).
I have lots of alternatives to sell apps. I can sell fully functional apps and games on Steam, Google Play, or directly in the browser so you and use and play directly in the browser. Steam is also 30%. Selling directly and via Epic is still the most expensive by far but you can do it.

If I am targeting iOS directly I can sell on the App Store knowing well in advance what fees I'll pay or I can sell a web app and work out ahead of time all the costs involved.

I am not beholden to Apple's rules and never have been. And at least I let my work stand on its own, these two developers failed and became millionaires from it.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CarlJ Avatar
62 months ago

Yes, because you had no choice and no alternative. Apple's won't allow anyone else to host an App Store on "their" phone (that you think you own).
Sure there was a choice - don’t develop for iOS. And there was an alternative - develop for Android or some other platform.

People keep talking like the iPhone and its ecosystem is some natural resource that should be managed by the government for the good of all people. It’s not. It’s something that Apple has built from the ground up, at great expense, and it’s their thing to do with as they see fit. If you don’t like how Apple runs it, vote with your wallet by moving to another platform.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ruka.snow Avatar
62 months ago

These got $100M … can now retire after paying the lawyers fees.
I guess if you can't earn from your own talent, you can just sue Apple for 'unfair' terms and come out on top.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)