Got a tip for us? Share it...

Early Benchmarks Show Significant Performance Gains for Core i7 MacBook Pro


MacBook Pro Geekbench results: 2.66 GHz Core i7 (green) vs. 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo (blue)

Gizmodo publishes preliminary benchmarks comparing the performance of Apple's new top-of-the-line 2.66 GHz Core i7-based 15" MacBook Pro released today to a previous-generation 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo model. With the caveat that the tests did not include the previous top-of-the-line 3.06 GHz model, the new MacBook Pro still seems to show impressive performance gains of nearly 50% on many tests.

The preliminary testing utilized two standard benchmarking utilities, Geekbench and Xbench, as well as a test of video re-encoding with 64-bit Handbrake. The Geekbench and Xbench results showed about 50% improvement over the previous-generation model in overall scoring, although the individual Xbench scores varied fairly significantly from only marginally better in Quartz and CPU tests to over twice as high in Thread and OpenGL tasks.



MacBook Pro Xbench results: 2.66 GHz Core i7 (purple) vs. 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo (blue)

Handbrake re-encoding speed also increased by about 35-40% in Gizmodo's testing with a 600 MB file, dropping from 32:19 to 19:54.

The performance gains come despite increased battery life in the new models, a result of more energy efficient components and a slight bump in battery capacity for the latest models. Apple's automatic graphics switching will enable seamless shifting between discrete and integrated graphics processors, allowing for maximum horsepower for tasks such as the benchmarks used above and maximum battery life for less power-hungry tasks.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

24 months ago
First yeah! That's great news. :D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago
they've taken their time with this one! but finaaallllyy
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago
Very reassuring! I just ordered the 2.66 i7 this morning. Glad to see test results for exactly the product I purchased :D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago
i really want to see how the i5 compares with the i7...hopefully someone benchmarks that model soon.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago
This is a good thing. A lot of people have been saying they can get better deals elsewhere from Dell or Acer or Sony. Fine. Do so. No one cares. What we care about is what we can get that runs OS X (legally), and these babies are the hottest things on the planet that can do so.

Don't bore me with a Windows machine specs. I don't run Windows, and I never will again.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago

i really want to see how the i5 compares with the i7...hopefully someone benchmarks that model soon.


anandtech did it on the Dell/HP models months ago and very little difference. only worth it if you run something that's very CPU intensive
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago
im curious how the auto switching graphics plays with ICC profiling.... on my current MBP, I have 2 profiles set (using a colorimeter). One for the 9400 and one for the onboard system graphics.

will the system continually change profiles on the fly, or will the GPU switch but leave you with a single, non optimal color profile?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago
further highlighting on how poor a decision it was to keep the C2D in the 13" :(
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago

further highlighting on how poor a decision it was to keep the C2D in the 13" :(


I would rather have the better graphcis than the better processor. I run a C2D just fine on my current laptop.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
24 months ago

anandtech did it on the Dell/HP models months ago and very little difference. only worth it if you run something that's very CPU intensive


Yeah, I'd like to see a benchmark too. I had this powerbook for 6+ years now and would like to hang to my mbp for a looong time too.

Adding 310 euros for the i7 it's a bit hard on the wallet, though...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]