Got a tip for us? Share it...

Subscriber Information and Revenue Sharing Seen as Hurdles to iPad Newspaper and Magazine Deals

Financial Times reports that talks between Apple and a number of newspaper and magazine publishers have encountered several hurdles that have slowed the deal-making process as the periodicals publishing industry attempts to understand how the move to digital distribution will affect its business.

One of the major concerns publishers are reportedly having pertains to Apple's policy of sharing only limited customer information with its content partners. As the report notes, publishers have long mined data on their subscribers in order to develop marketing efforts and evolve the focus of their publications over time, but Apple's reluctance to share that information is reportedly making publishers uneasy.

Apple's practice of sharing with its partners little consumer data beyond sales volume is a problem. "Is it a dealbreaker? It's pretty damn close," said one senior media executive of a US metropolitan daily newspaper.

Publishers have spent decades collecting information about subscribers that influence marketing plans and, in some cases, the content of the publication itself. Apple's policy would separate them from their most valuable asset, publishing executives said. "We must keep the relationship with our readers," says Sara hrvall, senior vice-president of research at Swedish publisher Bonnier . "That's the only way to make a good magazine."

Another concern for newspaper and magazine publishers is Apple's proposed revenue sharing arrangement, which involves Apple taking a 30% share of revenue for handling distribution. The arrangement is the same as that being used in dealings with book publishers and already in effect for application developers in the company's App Store. Periodical publishers are reportedly unhappy with being asked to give up 30% of revenue on an ongoing basis and argue that their recurring charges for continuing content should be treated differently than single-payment content offerings.

Despite the hurdles, the report notes that the talks are "considered friendly and continuing", suggesting that deals are still likely to be made as publishers remain excited about the platform and new potential revenue streams available through it.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

26 months ago
Wow I hope it doesn't stop the big deals being discussed but man I didn't realize publishers mined that much info from customers.

I say the heck with them. They can get info with the pop up ads in their ePublications.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
I don't know give up 30% in exchange for not having to print. Paper, supplies, factories to print etc.... Makes me wonder why the print business is going down hill at such a rapid pace.

The data... hmmmm maybe they will get even more data by people via clicks etc?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
Ok, what part of "duh" is missing from this article. Of course this is a change in revenue streams. Trying to make this a win-win for both is going to be a trick.

Most are just doing the "wait and see." When they come up with the right revenue model like they did for record companies and all the lemmings will come on board!

Before that, this is a big indie opportunity.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
I hope apple doesn't cave in on this one.(or apple will be just another google) I already don't like how apple and these news papers already have info on us to begin with. As people we should be in able to sell our marketing rights out to these companies instead of them just taking it from us.... since its so valuable to them to see what we all like and dislike. I feel that apple does a good enough job keeping our customer info secret to themselves, its what makes them so successful in the first place. Knowing what we want and don't want is worth more than gold.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
if periodicals did an annual pricepoint and gave apple 30% it wouldn't cut too much into their financial planning capabilities. maybe they are planning to sell things on a per-article basis? if that's what they think the solution is then they're screwed. Magazines etc sell the entire collection of articles -- the buyer pays for the fluff pieces and the long-term, expensive investigative journalism. If companies think they can charge per-article, they'll be disappointed in the results.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
And to think I was all ready to actually read something and buy the Sports Illustrated app.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
It must be hard for Steve to sit in the same room with some of these dumb asses and not hit them with chairs.

Are they stupid? They have an opportunity, through application development, to develop WAY more sensitive tracking information.

These guys have no clue. I hope Apple puts them all out of business.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
This confuses me. It didn't look to me like the iBooks reader was ideal for periodicals - it didn't seem to support fancy page layout options, etc. So are we talking about each magazine/newspaper as a separate app (with a 70%/30% split?) Can't they sell subscriptions outside of the apple store? Is apple demanding a cut of that revenue?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago

It must be hard for Steve to sit in the same room with some of these dumb asses and not hit them with chairs.

Are they stupid? They have an opportunity, through application development, to develop WAY more sensitive tracking information.

These guys have no clue. I hope Apple puts them all out of business.


You hope Apple puts out of business, a section of media that Apple is actively trying to pull into their fold to make money off of?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago

This confuses me. It didn't look to me like the iBooks reader was ideal for periodicals - it didn't seem to support fancy page layout options, etc. So are we talking about each magazine/newspaper as a separate app (with a 70%/30% split?) Can't they sell subscriptions outside of the apple store? Is apple demanding a cut of that revenue?


Yes. Magazines are probably apps. Any interactive heavy thing will be an app.

A concept from SI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntyXvLnxyXk
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]