Got a tip for us? Share it...

Rumors Revisited: Next-Generation iWork and iLife Plans? Apple Tablet Design Surprise?

Nearly a month before Apple updated its iMac line, French site Mac4Ever published a wide-ranging article revealing a number of tidbits on various topics obtained from its sources. At the time, the report was simply one of many circulating rumors about Apple's upcoming product announcements.

Mac4Ever's details, however, proved to be remarkably accurate once Apple made public its new products. The report correctly predicted the inclusion of an SD card slot and quad-core processors in the revised iMac, as well as pinpointing the Magic Mouse and the new aluminum Apple Remote. In fact, the only piece of information from Mac4Ever's report that has been shown incorrect was one source's claim that Apple might even go so far as to use Intel Xeon processors in the new iMacs.

Given the accuracy of most of Mac4Ever claims, a re-examination of the report's other, longer-term predictions seems appropriate. First, the report claimed that Apple was well on its way to updating its iLife and iWork applications to move to 64-bit and to take full advantage of the improvements included in Snow Leopard.

On the software side of things, Apple is probably deep into switching its group of iApps over to 64 bits, and taking full advantage of the new Snow Leopard technology. We've also been told that Leopard's compatibility hasn't been settled on yet, but that the 2010 suite would only support Macs with Intel-based processors.

A transition to Intel-only compatibility for the next-generation of iLife and iWork would not be a major surprise, as Snow Leopard itself dropped support for PPC-based Macs. What might be considered a bigger surprise is the possibility of the next version of iLife and iWork not supporting Mac OS X Leopard. Depending on when that software revision occurs, it could mark a very short turnaround from Snow Leopard's release in late August to discontinuation of support for Leopard, the immediately previous operating system version, in the iLife and iWork suites.

The question of when we can expect to see the next generation of iLife and iWork suites has also yet to be answered. Early in its development, iLife revisions were issued on a yearly basis each January at Macworld San Francisco. But as the suite matured, release cycles have slipped to closer to 18 months, with iLife '06 having been released in January 2006, iLife '08 in August 2007 (skipping an "iLife '07" release), and iLife '09 in January 2009. iWork releases have coincided with iLife updates since the productivity suite's introduction in January 2005.

Consequently, if Apple holds closer to its ~18-month release cycle going forward, users could expect the next generation of iLife and iWork suites to possibly be released in mid-2010, probably to be branded as "iLife '11" and "iWork '11" if 2007's pattern is any indication.

Apple has also recently dropped the "'09" designation from its iLife and iWork web pages and retail boxes, suggesting that the company is planning to continue selling the current versions of those suites well into 2010 and does not wish their names to make them appear outdated.


Comparison of Original (Left) and New (Right) iLife '09 Retail Boxes

The second still-outstanding claim from Mac4Ever relates to Apple's much-rumored tablet, which has recently been reported to be delayed until the second half of 2010, although the veracity of the claim is unknown. Mac4Ever's claim, however, provides only a vague suggestion that the tablet will be unlike any concept designs or renditions that have been floating around in recent months.

Concerning MacTablet, it will indeed be produced, but it will be far different from the concepts that have been announced so far on rumor sites.

The article offers no further information on what we can expect to see when Apple's tablet finally makes its appearance, but this claim and the report regarding iLife and iWork do carry some additional weight and bear close watching in the months ahead due to the accuracy of other claims made at the same time.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

29 months ago
Looking forward to it, especially if they are 64-bit. (No iTunes 9 32-bit cop-out please).

The sooner Apple gets all their flagship software moved over and using the technologies in Snow Leopard the better.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
I would like an updated iLife more then a tablet... Prepared for the inevitable flaming...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
The article says only that "Leopard compatibility was still not decided" so they may continue to support Leopard in the next iLife and iWork versions. If they aren't due out anytime soon, we'll have longer to guess.

Maybe dropping "09" from the product boxes means no new versions soon, or maybe Apple just wanted to save trees by keeping a supply of boxes that will work for either version.

Although they call the products iLife and iWork in the Apple Store, without the year, their component products still have the year in the name, e.g., "iWork" consists of Pages 09, Number 09, and Keynote 09.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
I don't see a reason to drop 10.5 support for iLife and iWork.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
wow the detail about the tablet was very telling...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago

I don't see a reason to drop 10.5 support for iLife and iWork.


Apple does. Buy new hardware.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
I've been saying the next iLife/iWork wouldn't be out until mid -2010. It makes sense with the previous development cycles. There is only so much you can update every 12 months. Maybe we'll get a Blu-Ray player mid-2010 with an update iDVD in iLife.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago

Apple does. Buy new hardware.

Snow Leopard has i386 and x64 binaries for all Intel Macs. I don't see a need for a new machine consider it'll more than likely be just another Core 2.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago
Sounds right. Now I want the pro apps 64-bit.

I expect apple to create a new authoring program that allows people to create their own iTunes LP/extra content.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
29 months ago

Snow Leopard has i386 and x64 binaries for all Intel Macs. I don't see a need for a new machine consider it'll more than likely be just another Core 2.


Apple screwed PPC people with SL. Do you really expect anything else from them?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]