Got a tip for us? Share it...

AT&T Weighs In Against Net Neutrality Regulations for Wireless Industry

CNET reports that AT&T and other wireless carriers and wireless trade associations are expressing concern over recent comments from U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski regarding his support for "Net neutrality", fearing that the current focus on wired Internet service will be expanded to included wireless networks.

The principles of Net neutrality include the idea that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should not be allowed to prevent users from accessing any particular sort of Internet content on their systems, although certain "network management" practices, which must be made public, can be employed. While wired ISPs have agreed to such regulations, wireless ISPs have expressed serious concerns over the effect such regulation could have on the limited spectrum available for wireless data transmission.

"AT&T has long supported the principle of an open Internet and has conducted its business accordingly," Jim Cicconi, AT&T's senior vice president of external and legislative affairs, said in a statement. "We were also early supporters of the FCC's current four broadband principles and their case-by-case application to wired networks."

But Cicconi went on to say that the principles and new legislation should not apply to the wireless market.

"We are concerned, however, that the FCC appears ready to extend the entire array of Net neutrality requirements to what is perhaps the most competitive consumer market in America: wireless services," he said.

He argues that wireless networks differ from wireline broadband networks because bandwidth is more limited on a wireless network. And he said that imposing new rules on how carriers operate their wireless networks would stifle investment.

AT&T has in the past expressed concern over the burden certain Internet content could place on its cellular network, and in fact cited those concerns in noting its role in the decision to keep video streaming on the high-profile SlingPlayer Mobile iPhone application limited to Wi-Fi-only. AT&T also received some scrutiny after Apple rejected an official Google Voice iPhone application, although the company has denied in a statement to the FCC that it was even consulted during the approval process for the application.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

31 months ago
I actually have to agree with AT&T on the point that wireless networks don't have the same bandwidth as wired networks.

I want to be able to make a phone call on my iPhone without having problems because people are streaming TV to their phones and are hogging all the bandwidth.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
On a Wireles Cellular level, I agree. On a wired (U-Verse, DSL) level, AT&T can suck it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago

I actually have to agree with AT&T on the point that wireless networks don't have the same bandwidth as wired networks.

I want to be able to make a phone call on my iPhone without having problems because people are streaming TV to their phones and are hogging all the bandwidth.


What makes you think Data and voice are sharing the same bands ?

You're agreeing with AT&T without even knowing a thing about the technology. Good job on being a tool of the system.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
If, as AT&T claims, wireless services are *so* competitive in the US, then why are mobile broadband prices *exactly the same* on all major carriers? It doesn’t matter if you go to AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or, Verizon; the top-tier data plan is $59.99/month for 5GB of data. IIRC, Sprint *used* to offer 'unlimited' with no fine print, but they went to 'unlimited'/5GB within the past few years. That just seems a little too coincidental.

Let’s just hope these same ridiculous prices don’t affect LTE & WiMAX, too.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
Just give is sling player over the cellular network. Also give us skype over the cellular data network. AT&T needs to invest more cash in their network, and so does everybody else. They should be as strong as the wired networks.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
Screw wireless, this would force them to actually update their networks.

On the other hand, they could be real jerks and let networks slow to a crawl and then just sit on their hands and beg the gov't for money and blame the FCC.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
I am sure they did.

AT&T just wants to walk the fine line of squeezing every last penny out of customers while providing as little service as possible.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
How much would it cost the wireless carriers to enhance their infrastructure?

How much do a few execs at these companies make each year?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago
Surprise! AT&T is evil.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
31 months ago

What makes you think Data and voice are sharing the same bands ?

You're agreeing with AT&T without even knowing a thing about the technology. Good job on being a tool of the system.


What makes you think otherwise?

Enlighten us, oh wise one. :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]