Next version of iOS with overhauled notifications, lock screen, Messages, Apple Music, and much more.
Apple Ordered to Halt iPhone 6 Sales in Beijing Over Patent Infringement Ruling [Updated]
However, as Bloomberg points out, if the case turns out badly for Apple, lawsuits that the company face in the future could potentially look back at the Shenzhen Baili ruling as a precedent. Beijing has a population of 21.7 million people, so it could have a larger-than-expected negative impact on a territory that Apple has already struggled with in the past.
The iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus infringe on Shenzhen Baili’s patent rights because of similarities to its 100C phone, the Beijing Intellectual Property Office wrote in its decision.Just last month, Apple lost the exclusive rights to the name "iPhone" in China, after a ruling by the Beijing Municipal High People’s Court favored leather goods maker Xintong Tiandi Technology. Apple has stayed headstrong in a retail rollout plan of new stores and locations for its Chinese users to visit and purchase its products, but the company still faces unexpected roadblocks in the country due to its strict internet policies.
While the decision covers only Beijing, future lawsuits against Apple could take the case as a precedent, potentially influencing the outcomes of litigation elsewhere in China. Baili is one of scores of smartphone brands trying to cash in on the country’s mobile boom.
Update: In a statement given to CNBC, Apple confirmed that both the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus (along with newer models) are "available for sale today in China," and that the company is already going through the appeal process in Beijing.
"iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus as well as iPhone 6s, iPhone6s Plus and iPhone SE models are all available for sale today in China. We appealed an administrative order from a regional patent tribunal in Beijing last month and as a result the order has been stayed pending review by the Beijing IP Court," Apple told CNBC in a statement.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)So sick of these insane copyright infringement cases.
I agree,but by the same token. Apple has been waging a war on Samsung regarding copyright.[doublepost=1466170181][/doublepost]
Looks like the previous bribe from Apple only brought them so far.
Its called "investment" :pThis case will be used to pull more money out of the Apple coffers by the government, which controls the courts.
Wow, this will hurt them, though I'm sure Apple will throw some money at them and fix the issue
It will not work. China is transitioning into a consumer economy and it's in their interest to keep out foreign competition (i.e. protectionism). Expect to see things much worse in the future for American companies.
Only in China does a multi-billion dollar international company get halted by a knock-off producer. If China wants to be taken as a serious modern economy, they need to overhaul their IP law and culture.
It's Chinese protectionism and they are just using their IP laws as an excuse.
China literally copies everything from everyone.
Wait....Samsung gets away with ripping Apple off even closer than this, but Apple is the one at fault when these two phones are compared!? Suuuuuuuure.
On the contrary, Samsung was found liable for infringement of Apple's design patents on a flat face, rounded edges, and a colorful grid of icons... even though at least one of those has been invalidated by the USPTO since... and has already paid hundreds of millions of dollars to Apple.
Even the Supreme Court refuses to overturn those infringements. (Although they've agreed to take up the question of award size.)
If a US court system can uphold infringement of such debatable design patents, then so can China.
Apple's policy of suing others over such fashion patents was short term smart, but was bound to have reciprocal consequences in the long term.
Yup. They are both rectangular. How dare Apple! Lol. Seriously? So sick of these insane copyright infringement cases.
Should work both ways when Apple sues Samsung thoug...[ Read All Comments ]



