Final Cut Studio Update Scaled Back and Delayed?

Hardmac reports that Apple's plans for a thorough overhaul of its Final Cut Studio have "suffered significant setbacks" that will see a release pushed back to 2011 from a rumored goal of a 2010 launch and result in significantly scaled-back changes to the professional-level video production software package.
A few months ago we told you that Apple were hoping to release a new version of their Final Cut Studio suite in 2010. It now seems likely that this target has been missed according to one of our sources. The development of this software suite has suffered significant setbacks and it will be necessary to wait until 2011 to see its release; furthermore, the scope of the project has been reduced.
According to the report, Apple has temporarily abandoned plans to bring a single interface to the Final Cut package as internal development teams have been unable to reach agreement on how the interface should be implemented. The interface overhaul has now been said to be pushed back to the following release of Final Cut, tentatively scheduled for a 2013 release.Additionally, the report claims that the Final Cut team's progress has been slowed as Apple has reassigned engineers to work on projects for the company's iOS devices.
Concern over the future of Apple's Final Cut offerings arose in February, when it was revealed that Apple had laid off 40 members of the project team. Several months later, a report claimed that Apple was looking to transition Final Cut Pro Pro from a strictly professional product to more of a "prosumer" offering, but Apple CEO Steve Jobs dismissed those concerns, stating that the next release of Final Cut Pro "will be awesome" and that the earlier job layoffs had been in support and not engineering. The following day, Apple issued an official statement similarly noting that the next version of Final Cut Pro will be "awesome".
Top Rated Comments
(View all)22 months ago
Absolute nonsense. Just building on all the previous nonsense for reinforcement. I need solid proof on this one, like an internal memo. 2010 was never a realistic goal, and it was imposed externally, not by Apple. The UI stuff MAY be true, but the real issue is 64 bit compatibility. We need to be able to USE all that RAM and all those cores that we pay for in a Macpro. That's why I am not upgrading until FCS has been updated. As for jumping ship, not likely when you have thousands in hardware and software invested in the FCS system, like most pro's do.
22 months ago
This hurts; bad. With Premiere Pro seeming to be happily multi-core aware, having the current best offering by Apple on FCP unable to really utilize more than 2 cores on their 6, 8 and 12 core machines is just pathetic; absolutely pathetic.
And now pushing this back to sometime next year is really go to hurt sales as far as I can tell.... how many loyal FCP users would jump ship to Adobe on this one?
And now pushing this back to sometime next year is really go to hurt sales as far as I can tell.... how many loyal FCP users would jump ship to Adobe on this one?
22 months ago
This is what happens when Apple became a consumer electronics company.
Not sure if anyone is really surprised by delays in their computing products.
Not sure if anyone is really surprised by delays in their computing products.
22 months ago
Hopefully Apple can get Final Cut off of the old Quicktime framework and on to the new one. That needed to happen with the last version.
Also, here's hoping they'll finally make that godawful joke known as Compressor into an actual pro product.
Also, here's hoping they'll finally make that godawful joke known as Compressor into an actual pro product.
22 months ago
The setback is being sidetracked working on Apple TV software and iphone updates. Maybe this next version will make use of even fewer cores!
22 months ago
how many loyal FCP users would jump ship to Adobe on this one?
Count me out. Multicore-aware or not, I'm not going to take the time to learn a different NLE. I'm comfortable with my workflow in FCP.
That said, it is a true atrocity that generation after generation of Mac Pro have been introduced yet, their full potential (inside of FCS) can't be reached because of software limitations. How can one justify dropping thousands of dollars on a turnkey Mac Pro when the software can't take full advantage of the hardware's power? It's like owning a Ferrari and being limited to 40MPH top speed.
22 months ago
Well this gives you all more time to switch to a modern app like adobe Premiere. Now that you know your going to have to learn a new app all-together in a few years.
[ Read All Comments ]

Our sister-site TouchArcade notes that Chillingo's excellent physics puzzler Feed Me Oil is free today for both the iPhone and iPad. It's normally $0.99 for iPhone and $1.99 for iPad....
Several years ago, Comcast began instituting bandwidth caps of 250GB per month on its residential customers. In 2008, this was plenty for most customers, but with the advent of streaming video...
Reuters reports that China Mobile Chairman Xi Guohua has once again publicly stated that the world's largest mobile phone carrier is engaged in talks with Apple about offering the iPhone to its...
Apple has filed a motion to dismiss in a case filed by customers over alleged misleading advertising depicting the Siri technology in the iPhone 4S. The lawsuit, filed in March, alleges that...
The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ASCI) today released its latest rankings of customer satisfaction in the United States for mobile phones and a number of products and services, with the new...