Got a tip for us? Share it...

Snow Leopard QuickTime X Interface and Other Changes

With the latest seed of Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Apple has made dramatic changes to QuickTime Player in both interface and features. Changes to the interface has gotten the most attention with a description posted by AppleInsider. The new QuickTime X playback window appears to be minimalistic with all user-interface pieces fading away, leaving just the video displayed:

The only window-based interface element in the QuickTime X Player is reportedly the title bar, which is reminiscent of the iPhone's semi-transparent black glass interface while also adopting hues from the video frames playing beneath it. However, this too fades away and disappears with the new overlay controls so videos appear to float on the screen with nothing more than a deep shadow surrounding all four sides.

While AppleInsider posts "mock ups" of the interface, Swedish site Feber.se appears to have posted a believable screenshot of the new player.

Apple's additional changes to QuickTime Player to "focus on playback" raise the possibility of the return of QuickTime Pro as a separate application. In previous seeds, it had been noted that QuickTime Pro features had been enabled by default in QuickTime Player. With this latest revamp, however, many of the "Pro" encoding features seem to be in transition, and introducing a the more simplistic "ability to export video clips in a variety of sizes to your iTunes library .... or publish them through a MobileMe account".

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

38 months ago
This is nice to see. I've alway felt QuickTime was lacking. I really hope they get rid of QuickTime Pro and that entire idea, the entire application and associated features should be standard. Sounds like it looks great! :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
You'll still need to pay for the Pro because of MPEG-2 licensing fees.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
@AUZBURNER, you got it wrong mate, it sounds that they stripping quicktime even more and that they make pro a necessity, shame really, very very bad apple to cripple us like this...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
Does resolution independence work better than Leopard? It sucks on Leopard enough that I do not use it. I want 1920*1200 on 15"
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
Tack så mycket feber.se!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago

You'll still need to pay for the Pro because of MPEG-2 licensing fees.


Not if the licensing fee was thrown into the Snow Leopard price. In other words, Apple would be making less profit. But it would be a nice move.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago

Not if the licensing fee was thrown into the Snow Leopard price. In other words, Apple would be making less profit. But it would be a nice move.


Finder is much faster - can't wait to see final delivery and 10.5.7.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
Tiny pic has some screenshots:

Mouse over:
http://i40.tinypic.com/14ka69y.png

Mouse not over:
http://i44.tinypic.com/2chl40o.png

What that button next to the fullscreen button does:
http://i39.tinypic.com/euis02.png

You'll noticed that the naming schema of screenshots is no longer "Picture #.png" it's "Screenshot on [date] at [time].png"
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago

Tiny pic has some screenshots:

Mouse over:
http://i40.tinypic.com/14ka69y.png

Mouse not over:
http://i44.tinypic.com/2chl40o.png

What that button next to the fullscreen button does:
http://i39.tinypic.com/euis02.png

You'll noticed that the naming schema of screenshots is no longer "Picture #.png" it's "Screenshot on [date] at [time].png"


Anything new in the finder? Nice Pics Thanks
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
38 months ago
This doesn't sound good. I don't like it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]