Got a tip for us? Share it...
• • RSS

iPod Video Conferencing Patent [Updated]

Wednesday June 14, 2006 5:44 am PDT by longofest
AppleInsider has found a recent patent filing, presumably by Apple in conjunction with some select 3rd party manufacturers, that describes a device that can "compress, enhance, encode, transmit, decompress and display digital video images in real time." The device depicts a modified 1G/2G iPod with a color display with a headset hooked up to the traditional headphone jack and a video camera hooked up to where the remote jack used to be. There is also a infrared port on the bottom right for wireless connection to an optional A/V module that could enclose a speaker, camera, microphone, and additional display all in one.

While certainly interesting, there has been no additional information that has shown Apple is actively seeking to bring such a device to market. Also depicted via photograph, but not discussed in the story is a cell phone showed to also include video conferencing capability. It is not known if this supposed to reference the rumored "iPhone."

Updated: Macsimum has an in-depth article on the patent.
[ 20 comments ]

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

Avatar
iGary
74 months ago
Oooh, that would be interesting.

Next thing you know they will build iSights into mice.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
Macnoviz
74 months ago
Very Nice, although it does seem a bit clungy with an extra module. The iPhone rumors may begin to grow, as well, but still, we won't see those things very soon.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
balamw
74 months ago


AppleInsider has found a recent patent filing, presumably by Apple in conjunction with some select 3rd party manufacturers

The sole named inventor is not an Apple employee so why would this be an Apple patent? Do they think he's ghpst inventing for someone else? In my experience, the patent system doesn't really work that way. If Kendyl Roman claims to be the inventor of this, Kendyl Roman had better be the inventor for the patent to stand up in court. He could potentially add a few names to the application at this stage in the game, but that is rare. A couple of clues that this is not the case are the references to "my co-pending application ..."

This sounds like the work of someone with lots of IP experience making a prediction of where things could go and putting his stake in the ground. Think of it as buying a lottery ticket.

B
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
Super Dave
74 months ago

AppleInsider has found a recent patent filing


Although AppleInsider may have found this independently, Macsimum News had it up first and in my opinion has a better article.

Either way, I'm really glad that MacRumors lists its sources because other web sites seem not to. Go MacRumors! Honesty makes you cooler.

David :cool:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
balamw
74 months ago

Although AppleInsider may have found this independently, Macsimum News had it up first and in my opinion has a better article.

You're right it's a much better article!

B
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
bigandy
74 months ago

Next thing you know they will build iSights into mice.



i'm sure all the web voyeurs would love to see people's sweaty palms!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
longofest
74 months ago

Either way, I'm really glad that MacRumors lists its sources because other web sites seem not to. Go MacRumors! Honesty makes you cooler.


Glad someone notices :) It's definitely a big rule of journalism and journalistic etiquite that seems to be forgotten on a lot of websites, although I have noticed that AppleInsider, for instance, has been giving credit more often recently.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
CTYankee
74 months ago
Not an Apple Patent. The inventors are just guys who thought of the idea, and 'assigned' it to this IP firm. So it looks like the Roman guy runs a company that comes up with patents and then sells/liscences them to whoever wants to use the technology. In this case they are targeting Apple.

I didn't see the actual filing, anyone know if Apple patents are listed in the prior art? Apple could get this invalidated if they have prior art that this infringes on. Something I'd be sure they have thought of. Thats what you do...develop a product, think of every possible application and use long before you plan to do it (even if you DON'T plan to ever use it) and file an application. That way you creat a 'patent hedge' around your products so no one can do what you are doing.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
boncellis
74 months ago
The thing that makes this potentially exciting is if it comes from Apple--they'll know how to do it the best way, I think. If it's from a third party and Apple has no part of the development, then it's not the same. The idea of handheld videoconferencing has been around for a while, I believe either Samsung or Sony Ericsson released a phone that could do it in Japan a few years back.

If Apple does get on board though, maybe it could be an add-on to the iPod effectively converting it to the long-awaited iPhone. Not sure how well it would be received though until you add functionality for it to work on mobile phone networks. Presumably that's what's in mind.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
Collin973
74 months ago
This doesn't seem to be a bad idea, but is there really any market for something like this? "Oh check it out. I can video confrence from anywhere"...it's a great idea, but I don't know many people who need to video confrence from the subway....Also, won't new york need to make a new law "No Using your Video Ipod while driving"
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]